2016
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflammatory markers are associated with cardiac autonomic dysfunction in recent-onset type 2 diabetes

Abstract: Biomarkers of inflammation were differentially associated with diminished cardiac autonomic dysfunction in recent-onset type 2 diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
32
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous clinical trials have confirmed the association of inflammatory biomarkers with CAN in patients with recently diagnosed T2DM. However, there was no clear association between CAN and IL-6 in this group of patients 29 . A considerable weakness of this study is the limited number of the participants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Previous clinical trials have confirmed the association of inflammatory biomarkers with CAN in patients with recently diagnosed T2DM. However, there was no clear association between CAN and IL-6 in this group of patients 29 . A considerable weakness of this study is the limited number of the participants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…A possible explanation for this response is the larger pro-inflammatory state compared to their normal weight counterparts [14,27,28]. Different inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein [29][30][31], leukocyte [31,32], and leptin [33] are inversely associated with HRV. Another explanation for these results involve the volume and intensity of physical activities performed by adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, CRF and HRV were determined in 163 patients with type 1 diabetes and compared with 40 age-matched glucose-tolerant control subjects (control 1), and 188 patients with type 2 diabetes were compared with another 40 control subjects (control 2) ( Table 1). Participants , and LF/HF ratio as previously described (25).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%