2019
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and the Risk of Erectile Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated attributable risk arising from inflammatory bowel disease amounted to 0.022 ( Friedman et al, 2018 ). Furthermore, another study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program involving 23 million participants showed that the prevalence of ED was 1.65 times higher in men aged 20 years or older with inflammatory bowel disease compared to those without the condition ( Lai et al, 2019 ). In addition, Kao et al performed a prospective cohort study to investigate the correlation between inflammatory bowel disease and ED, and they revealed the risk of developing ED in inflammatory bowel disease individuals was 1.64-fold that of the non-inflammatory bowel disease controls ( Kao et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated attributable risk arising from inflammatory bowel disease amounted to 0.022 ( Friedman et al, 2018 ). Furthermore, another study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program involving 23 million participants showed that the prevalence of ED was 1.65 times higher in men aged 20 years or older with inflammatory bowel disease compared to those without the condition ( Lai et al, 2019 ). In addition, Kao et al performed a prospective cohort study to investigate the correlation between inflammatory bowel disease and ED, and they revealed the risk of developing ED in inflammatory bowel disease individuals was 1.64-fold that of the non-inflammatory bowel disease controls ( Kao et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the quality assessment of the included studies were presented in Tables S1-S3. Two studies (24,26) were considered high quality, eight (25,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) were considered moderate quality, and one (27) were considered low quality due to the lack of information about potential confounders and follow-up years.…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%