Abstract-Of novel risk factors for cardiovascular disease currently under investigation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) is the most promising. To date, more than 20 prospective epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that hsCRP independently predicts vascular risk, 6 cohort studies have confirmed that hsCRP evaluation adds prognostic information beyond that available from the Framingham Risk Score, and 8 cohort studies have demonstrated additive prognostic value at all levels of metabolic syndrome or in the prediction of type 2 diabetes. In contrast to several other biomarkers that also reflect biological aspects of inflammation, hypofibrinolysis, and insulin resistance, hsCRP measurement is inexpensive, standardized, widely available, and has a decade-to-decade variation similar to that of cholesterol. Given the consistency of prognostic data for hsCRP and the practicality of its use in outpatient clinical settings, we believe the time has come for a careful consideration of adding hsCRP as a clinical criterion for metabolic syndrome and for the creation of an hsCRP-modified coronary risk score useful for global risk prediction in both men and women. Toward this end, we believe experts in the fields of epidemiology, prevention, vascular biology, and clinical cardiology should be convened to begin discussing the merits of this proposal. Key Words: inflammation Ⅲ risk factors Ⅲ prevention Ⅲ diabetes mellitus Ⅲ atherosclerosis T he identification of individuals who are at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease but who currently lack symptoms is a critical issue in primary prevention. For more than 30 years, cardiovascular risk prediction algorithms have relied on blood pressure, smoking status, hyperlipidemia, and the presence or absence of diabetes. These core traditional risk factors for heart disease and stroke derive largely from the groundbreaking Framingham Heart Study that first provided the conceptual basis for cardiovascular risk factors in the early 1960s. 1 With corroborating evidence from major cohort studies performed worldwide, these risk factors and their interactions with age and sex were formally codified in the 1980s into the Framingham Risk Score. 2,3 This scoring system, along with its European counterpart, 4 has been highly successful and forms the basis for most coronary risk detection and prevention programs. 5 In current practice, those with 10-year Framingham coronary heart disease (CHD) risk estimates that are less than 5% are considered to be at low risk, those with 10-year estimates between 6% and 20% are considered at intermediate risk, and those with 10-year risks of 20% and higher (or who have diabetes) are considered to be coronary risk equivalents. 6,7 Despite the success of the Framingham Risk Score, there are limitations to this approach. First, it is widely recognized that a fifth of all events occur among individuals in whom traditional risk factors have not been identified. 8 Moreover, the specificity of traditional risk factors is limited. 9 Multiple stu...