2021
DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflammation Adjustments to Serum Retinol and Retinol-Binding Protein Improve Specificity but Reduce Sensitivity when Estimating Vitamin A Deficiency Compared with the Modified Relative Dose-Response Test in Ghanaian Children

Abstract: Background Serum retinol and retinol-binding protein (RBP) concentrations are commonly used biomarkers of vitamin A deficiency (VAD); however, evidence indicates that they are not always accurate, especially in populations with high exposure to inflammation. Objective Assess sensitivity and specificity of serum retinol and RBP concentrations to predict VAD, with and without adjustment for inflammation (using categorical and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the using the cut-off for serum RBP (<0·7 μmol/l), in lieu of serum retinol (<0·7 μmol/l), to signify deficiency (4,6) is also likely inappropriate. Researchers have proposed methods to adjust serum retinol and RBP concentrations for inflammation, but the utility of these adjustments need further exploration (28) . These results highlight the need for extra consideration of appropriate cut-offs in studies and surveys that use RBP to estimate VAD prevalence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the using the cut-off for serum RBP (<0·7 μmol/l), in lieu of serum retinol (<0·7 μmol/l), to signify deficiency (4,6) is also likely inappropriate. Researchers have proposed methods to adjust serum retinol and RBP concentrations for inflammation, but the utility of these adjustments need further exploration (28) . These results highlight the need for extra consideration of appropriate cut-offs in studies and surveys that use RBP to estimate VAD prevalence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%