Inflaming public debate: a methodology to determine origin and characteristics of hate speech about sexual and gender diversity on Twitter

Abstract

This article is focused on the reproduction of ideologically charged messages whose origins or interests remain hidden from public opinion. There is an urgent need for transparency regarding polarised debates that deform, impede or distort the critical approach that any society should be able to construct concerning issues of great social interest, especially on social media platforms and networks. Research has shown that hostility has colonised digital communication through misogynist, homophobic, transphobic or xenophobic messages, among others, and that, for the most part, these are not spontaneous or individual interactions. In the virtual space, there are forces that, although invisible outside it, construct narratives, generate disinformation and feed generally regressive ideological approaches. Thus, in the name of transparency and social justice, there is an urgent need to investigate these types of messages, as well as their possible destabilising interests at a time of special presence and reputation of discourses such as the feminist one, which is currently experiencing a significant reactionary response. This paper investigates the origin and characteristics of the conversation on the social network Twitter concerning gender and sexual identities. To this end, we studied a significant sample of tweets (>1 million) related to women’s rights, the LGBTIQ+ collective and trans people, for a full year. Computerised methodologies by means of machine learning techniques, natural language processing (NLP), determination of bots, geolocation, and the application of network theories were used to carry out the study. The results include the highly interrelated presence of groups without clear referents, as well as the existence of what appear to be coordinated networks aimed at causing harm and provoking confrontation.

Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society

“…154 [203] COVID-19 and the "Film Your Hospital" conspiracy theory: Social network analysis of Twitter data 155 [204] Fake news and aggregated credibility: Conceptualizing a co-creative medium for evaluation of sources online 156 [205] COVID-19 Information on YouTube: Analysis of Quality and Reliability of Videos in Eleven Widely Spoken Languages across Africa 157 [206] COVID-19: Retransmission of official communications in an emerging pandemic 158 [207] Insights from twitter conversations on lupus and reproductive health: Protocol for a content analysis 159 [208] Temporal and location variations, and link categories for the dissemination of COVID-19-related information on twitter during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance study 160 [209] Inflaming public debate: a methodology to determine origin and characteristics of hate speech about sexual and gender diversity on Twitter 161 [210] How to fight an infodemic: The four pillars of infodemic management 162 [211] Genesis of an emergency public drug information website by the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics during the COVID-19 pandemic 163 [212] YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: A pandemic of misinformation?…”