1971
DOI: 10.5802/aif.398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinitely divisible processes and their potential theory. II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, little has been written on stable processes with drift. In view of the extensive results known for the potential theory [6] and the path behavior [3,4] for infinitely divisible processes in general, the interest today in special processes such as stable processes with drift lies in the fact that for such processes rather explicit results may be obtained.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, little has been written on stable processes with drift. In view of the extensive results known for the potential theory [6] and the path behavior [3,4] for infinitely divisible processes in general, the interest today in special processes such as stable processes with drift lies in the fact that for such processes rather explicit results may be obtained.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explicit form of the kernel a(x) and the fact that p(t,x) ~ j(l + b2)~x enable one to easily apply the general theory in [6] to obtain explicit asymptotic formulas analogous to those in the above theorems. Since this amounts to just plugging in to the formulas in [6] we omit these details.…”
Section: Eb(t A) -Tpb(a) ~ C(b)pb(a) ^-J (¿Y) Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, let u (0) t (x) := u 0 (x), and then define iteratively 27) for t > 0, x ∈ R, and n ≥ 0, where the stochastic convolution is defined in (2.8). Clearly,…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where X t has a purely singular distribution for every t > 0, we make an additional assumption that P x (T B = T intB ) = 1 for almost every x. Let The following lemma is a result obtained by a series of works [36], [8], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Assertion (i) is given in Theorem 14.2 of [26] and assertion (ii) is in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.3 and Theorem 1 of [25] with (3.19) and (14.13) of [26], respectively.…”
Section: Applications To Stable Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%