2006
DOI: 10.1515/forum.2006.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite interacting diffusion particles I: Equilibrium process and its scaling limit

Abstract: A stochastic dynamics (X(t)) t≥0 of a classical continuous system is a stochastic process which takes values in the space Γ of all locally finite subsets (configurations) in R d and which has a Gibbs measure µ as an invariant measure. We assume that µ corresponds to a symmetric pair potential φ(x − y). An important class of stochastic dynamics of a classical continuous system is formed by diffusions. Till now, only one type of such dynamics-the so-called gradient stochastic dynamics, or interacting Brownian pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Now we would like to list some facts the proofs of which are completely analogous to those proposed in [13,17]. Remark 4.8.…”
Section: Verification Of Assumption 32mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we would like to list some facts the proofs of which are completely analogous to those proposed in [13,17]. Remark 4.8.…”
Section: Verification Of Assumption 32mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To this class belongs the Glauber type dynamics in continuum which are under active consideration, see [3,29]. Another class of interesting stochastic processes is formed by the Kawasaki type dynamics in continuum [19] and gradient diffusions [1,17]. Most of the results we have up to now for these processes are related to the equilibrium case (via the Dirichlet forms approach) [13,18] or to the processes in bounded domains (see, e.g., [8,24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, using (8), we see that (17) and (22) converge to (14), whereas (21) and (23) converge to (15). Therefore, (12) and (13) hold.…”
Section: Theorem 3 Let S ∈ [0 1/2] Be Fixed Assume That the Pair Pomentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Using the methods of [14,Section 4] (see also [11,Section 6]), one can show that d V (·, γ) ∈ D(E Γ ) and there exists G 1 ∈ L 1 (Γ f ( X), ρ) (independent of γ) such that S Γ (d V (·, γ)) ≤ G 1 ρ-a.e. Hence, we only need to prove that d f (·, γ) ∈ D(E Γ ) and there exists G 2 ∈ L 1 (Γ f ( X), ρ) (independent of γ) such that S Γ (d f (·, γ)) ≤ G 2 ρ-a.e.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion process has µ as invariant (and even symmetrizing) measure. To prove the main result, we use the general theory of Dirichlet forms [13] as well as the theory of Dirichlet forms over configuration spaces [14,18], see also [1,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%