2005
DOI: 10.4310/pamq.2005.v1.n3.a8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite Dimensional Groups and Automorphic L-Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The automorphic representation π is cuspidal, as one sees from Remark 5.9 and Proposition 5.11 of [Sh3]. Here are two other proofs of the same assertion, both using more the associated ℓ-adic representation.…”
Section: Here Is a Gentle Strengthening Of Theorem Amentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The automorphic representation π is cuspidal, as one sees from Remark 5.9 and Proposition 5.11 of [Sh3]. Here are two other proofs of the same assertion, both using more the associated ℓ-adic representation.…”
Section: Here Is a Gentle Strengthening Of Theorem Amentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, whereas the unipotent radical of P can be equipped with a suitable projective limit structure [11, §3] which makes its arithmetic quotient compact, the unipotent radical for P − is not known to have any such structure. F. Shahidi [35] showed that a naive extension of the Langlands-Shahidi method (involving the constant term for P ) could not capture any nontrivial automorphic L-functions. A. Braverman and D. Kazhdan proposed that the constant term for P − contains the anticipated L-functions L(s, φ, ρ), where φ is a cusp form on M and ρ occurs in the adjoint action of L M .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F. Shahidi [35] showed that a naive extension of the Langlands-Shahidi method (involving the constant term for P ) could not capture any nontrivial automorphic L-functions. A. Braverman and D. Kazhdan proposed that the constant term for P − contains the anticipated L-functions L(s, φ, ρ), where φ is a cusp form on M and ρ occurs in the adjoint action of L M .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is however not precisely clear if this extension of the theory of Eisenstein series will yield necessarily to new types of L-functions and the focus of the discussion has so far been on series defined on affine groups. In fact in [388] an argument was provided that no new functions will be found, while in [152] a new method for obtaining such functions was devised. This new method relies on an expansion of the series with respect to "lower triangular parabolics", instead of only "upper triangular parabolics".…”
Section: Gravity Motivation: Quantum Cosmological Billiardsmentioning
confidence: 99%