1984
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1984-0743740-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite crossed products and group-graded rings

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we precisely determine when a crossed product R * G is semiprime or prime. Indeed we show that these conditions ultimately depend upon the analogous conditions for the crossed products R * N of the finite subgroups N of G and upon the interrelationship between the normalizers of these subgroups and the ideal structure of R. The proof offered here is combinatorial in nature, using the A-methods, and is entirely self-contained. Furthermore, since the argument applies equally well to stro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Passman's example of a field which is a twisted group algebra of an infinite periodic group ( [15,Proposition 4.3]) shows that the restriction on periodic subgroups cannot be removed from Corollaries 10 and 11.…”
Section: Corollary 10 Let S Be a Linear Cancellative Semigroup With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passman's example of a field which is a twisted group algebra of an infinite periodic group ( [15,Proposition 4.3]) shows that the restriction on periodic subgroups cannot be removed from Corollaries 10 and 11.…”
Section: Corollary 10 Let S Be a Linear Cancellative Semigroup With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If in addition, S x S y = S xy holds for all x, y ∈ G, then S is said to be strongly G-graded. An interesting problem, studied for the past 50 years, concerns finding necessary and sufficient conditions for different classes of group graded rings to be prime, see [4,9,10,28,29,35,36,37,38,39,40]. In the case when S is unital and strongly G-graded, Passman has completely solved this problem by proving the following rather involved result: Theorem 1.1 (Passman [40,Thm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If x ∈ G, then I x denotes the S e -ideal S x −1 IS x . Let H, N be subgroups of G. The ideal I is called H-invariant if I x ⊆ I holds for every x ∈ H; S N denotes x∈N S x , which is clearly a subring of S. In [40] Passman provided a "combinatorial" proof of Theorem 1.1 by combining two main ideas. First, a coset counting method, also known as the "∆-method", developed by Passman [35] and Connell [10], secondly, the "bookkeeping procedure" introduced by Passman in [38] which involves a careful study of the action of the group G on the lattice of ideals of S e .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a crossed product D * A (see [19,Ch. 1]), where D is a division ring, the multiplication is defined as in (ii) above, but an element d ∈ D need not be central.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known (see, for example, [19,Lemma 37.8]) that if B is a subgroup of A, then S B = F * B \ {0} is an Ore subset in F * A. As a consequence, the subset T S B (M) of M, consisting of all x such that xs = 0 for some s ∈ S B , is an F * A-submodule of M. We say that M is S B -torsion or F * B-torsion if T S B (M) = M and S B -torsion-free or F * B-torsion-free if T S B (M) = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%