2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infiltration, Runoff, and Export of Dissolved Organic Carbon from Furrow-Irrigated Forage Fields under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in the Arid Climate of California

Abstract: Development of best management practices (BMPs) such as conservation tillage and winter cover crop to mitigate runoff and reduce dissolved chemicals in irrigation runoff is an important objective for controlling surface water pollution attributable to agricultural activities. In this study, the effect of standard tillage (ST), ST with winter cover cropping (STCC), and no-till (NT) management practices on infiltration, runoff, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export from furrow-irrigated fields of 244-m lengt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore these results, which indicate that a far greater amount of C is potentially lost as sediment than as DOC, may not be broadly generalizable. However, if well water is used for irrigation, it is likely that TSS-C loss is greater than DOC-C loss since well water contains very little sediment, and any sediment in runoff represents a loss of C, whereas this and other studies show that, during irrigation, DOC is generally contributing to an increase in field C [46,47]. In the present study, sediment in the inflow water was below our detection limit.…”
Section: Effects Of Residue Treatments and Fieldcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore these results, which indicate that a far greater amount of C is potentially lost as sediment than as DOC, may not be broadly generalizable. However, if well water is used for irrigation, it is likely that TSS-C loss is greater than DOC-C loss since well water contains very little sediment, and any sediment in runoff represents a loss of C, whereas this and other studies show that, during irrigation, DOC is generally contributing to an increase in field C [46,47]. In the present study, sediment in the inflow water was below our detection limit.…”
Section: Effects Of Residue Treatments and Fieldcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Not specified British Columbia, Canada [29] Improve water infiltration Black oat (Avena strigose) Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Uraguay [30] Winter wheat Silage maize California, USA [31] Bromegrass (Bromus inermis), resident vegetation, and strawberry clover (Trifolium fragiferum) Hairy vetch Tomato Maryland, USA [39] Hairy vetch, sunnhemp, soybeans [25] Increase microbial activity…”
Section: Reduce Soil Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the positive impacts of organic amendments on soil quality and crop yield in both temperate and tropical countries have been amply demonstrated, the impact of these amendments on soil runoff and the impact of that runoff on adjacent aquatic systems has been less studied. The concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil runoff is strongly influenced by soil organic carbon content, soil erosion, vegetation cover, amounts, and intensities of rainfall, as well as type of composting applied ( Mailapalli et al, 2012 ; Worrall et al, 2012 ; Janeau et al, 2014 ; Pommier et al, 2014 ). It is therefore important to understand the fate of this DOC, as runoff has the potential to impact adjacent terrestrial and/or aquatic ecosystems ( Jacinthe et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%