1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1982.tb02712.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast

Abstract: On review of the histology of 1050 primary breast carcinomas, 103 cases of infiltrating lobular carcinoma were identified and clinical and survival data collected in each case. The tumours were then separated into four groups on the basis of histological pattern and these groups shown to have significantly different survival times. Assessment of the presence of in situ carcinoma, elastosis and intracyto‐plasmic lumina was performed in each case and the effect of these features on survival investigated. In addi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
101
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
101
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the differences in stage, tumour size, and lymph node status observed here may reflect differences in the utility of screening approaches to detect different histologic types of cancer. For example, it is well known that lobular tumours are more difficult to detect with mammography compared to ductal tumours, and this is thought to be primarily due to the fact that lobular tumours tend to grow as linear strands or sheets of cancer cells rather than as more discrete masses, explaining why they are more likely to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage (Davis et al, 1979;Dixon et al, 1982;Silverstein et al, 1994;Yeatman et al, 1995). Thus, currently, available breast cancer screening tools appear to be relatively less or relatively more effective in detecting different histopathologic types of breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the differences in stage, tumour size, and lymph node status observed here may reflect differences in the utility of screening approaches to detect different histologic types of cancer. For example, it is well known that lobular tumours are more difficult to detect with mammography compared to ductal tumours, and this is thought to be primarily due to the fact that lobular tumours tend to grow as linear strands or sheets of cancer cells rather than as more discrete masses, explaining why they are more likely to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage (Davis et al, 1979;Dixon et al, 1982;Silverstein et al, 1994;Yeatman et al, 1995). Thus, currently, available breast cancer screening tools appear to be relatively less or relatively more effective in detecting different histopathologic types of breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include, the solid variant, 10 the alveolar variant, 3 the tubulo-lobular variant, 11 the signet ring variant, 12 the histiocytoid variant 13 and a mixed subgroup. 12 The mixed subgroup, in Dixon et al's 12 original paper, was recognized when an invasive lobular carcinoma was comprised of a mixture of variants or when the invasive lobular carcinoma had a classic growth pattern, but the degree of nuclear pleomorphism was greater than that seen in the classic subgroup. Eusebi et al 14 described the clinical outcome in a group of cases he termed 'pleomorphic lobular carcinoma' which had the growth pattern of classic invasive lobular carcinoma but showed at least a moderate degree of nuclear pleomorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, it is generally accepted that LCIS is present in 60-70% of all ILC cases and that the presence of LCIS is by no means mandatory for the correct diagnosis of ILC (Dixon et al, 1982). Fechner (1972) described ductal epithelial involvement, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is general agreement that patients with ISC have significantly better prognosis than those with IDC or ILC, but there is still controversy as to whether the prognoses of IDC and ILC differ (Howell and Harris, 1985;DiCostanzo et al, 1990;Sastre-Garau et al, 1996). The studies performed to solve this issue have mostly been based on a small number of patients, and relatively few reports including more than 100 cases have been published so far (Dixon et al, 1982;DiCostanzo et al, 1990;du Toit et al, 1991;Silverstein et al, 1994). Moreover, only a few reports are based on a well-defined cohort, and there is little data available comparing long-term survival of patients with ILC with that of patients with IDC (Sastre-Garau et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%