2017
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjx006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infiltrating caecal carcinoma versus appendicitis with caecal phlegmon—can computer tomography differentiate them?

Abstract: Right iliac fossa pain is a common acute general surgery presentation, and computer tomography (CT) is often used as an aid in determining the diagnosis. CT can play an important role in differentiating malignant and inflammatory causes of caecal wall thickening if certain key features are identified. Two patients with similar presentations of right iliac fossa pain had pre-operative CT, which showed inflammation and caecal thickening, the first was focal with homogenous enhancement, and the second eccentric w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some CT features that can help in the differentiation of benign from malignant causes, where there is a focal asymmetric and eccentric bowel wall thickening (with less than 5cm). It can also be detected homogeneous contrast enhancement due to infiltration of a tumor mass, or a heterogeneous area of low attenuation from ischemia and necrosis (14). Magnetic Resonance (MRI) has been demonstrated to be a useful tool on pregnant and young patients (4).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some CT features that can help in the differentiation of benign from malignant causes, where there is a focal asymmetric and eccentric bowel wall thickening (with less than 5cm). It can also be detected homogeneous contrast enhancement due to infiltration of a tumor mass, or a heterogeneous area of low attenuation from ischemia and necrosis (14). Magnetic Resonance (MRI) has been demonstrated to be a useful tool on pregnant and young patients (4).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%