2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9201(03)00156-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring upper-mantle temperatures from seismic velocities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

31
598
0
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(647 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
31
598
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Midoceanic ridges, known to be hotter than average, are seismically slower than average; the cooling of the oceanic lithosphere with age appears as progressively faster wave speeds away from the midoceanic ridge systems; and ancient continental shields are in general marked by low average heat flow and faster than average seismic propagation speed. This is consistent with analyses of mineral physics data, which show that at shallow depths in the mantle, seismic velocities are generally much less sensitive to composition than to variations in temperature [Deschamps et al, 2002;Cammarano et al, 2003]. However, chemical depletion of subcontinental lithosphere [e.g., the tectosphere hypothesis of Jordan, 1975] can lead to small detectable changes in wave speeds identifiable by considering decorrelations between P-and S-wave tomography [Goes et al, 2000], combined tomography and gravity data [Forte and Perry, 2000;Deschamps et al, 2002;van Gerven et al, 2004] and seismic anisotropy [Beghein and Trampert, 2004].…”
Section: Origin Of Wave Speed Anomalies: Demise Of the Thermal Paradigmsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Midoceanic ridges, known to be hotter than average, are seismically slower than average; the cooling of the oceanic lithosphere with age appears as progressively faster wave speeds away from the midoceanic ridge systems; and ancient continental shields are in general marked by low average heat flow and faster than average seismic propagation speed. This is consistent with analyses of mineral physics data, which show that at shallow depths in the mantle, seismic velocities are generally much less sensitive to composition than to variations in temperature [Deschamps et al, 2002;Cammarano et al, 2003]. However, chemical depletion of subcontinental lithosphere [e.g., the tectosphere hypothesis of Jordan, 1975] can lead to small detectable changes in wave speeds identifiable by considering decorrelations between P-and S-wave tomography [Goes et al, 2000], combined tomography and gravity data [Forte and Perry, 2000;Deschamps et al, 2002;van Gerven et al, 2004] and seismic anisotropy [Beghein and Trampert, 2004].…”
Section: Origin Of Wave Speed Anomalies: Demise Of the Thermal Paradigmsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This method, which is distinct from but complements geothermal modeling of heat flow data, provides a means to estimate the 3D upper-mantle temperature structure from measured seismic velocities. This temperature estimation method has been successfully applied in the studies of several continents (Cammarano et al, 2003;Goes and Van der Lee, 2002;Goes et al, 2000;Rohm et al, 2000;Shapiro and Ritzwoller, 2004). An and Shi (2006) calculated the 3D upper-mantle temperature structure of the Chinese continent from seismic velocities measurements in 3D, and used these results to estimate the lithospheric thickness on a 1°× 1°grid, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Gravitational Effect Of the Undulated Mantle Lithospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding constraints from gravity or geoid data, joint inversions for seismic velocity and density have been performed because of the better chance to isolate thermal and compositional effects (11-13). Whereas temperature sensitivity dominates for seismic velocities, especially at shallow depths (7,14,15), density also strongly varies with composition.Besides the trade-off between temperature and composition, an important issue for seismic interpretation concerns the fact that a seismic model is not required to have a meaning in terms of these physical parameters.Typically, the interpretation of a given seismic data set is performed in two steps. First, a seismic model is constructed that fits the data satisfactorily.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding constraints from gravity or geoid data, joint inversions for seismic velocity and density have been performed because of the better chance to isolate thermal and compositional effects (11)(12)(13). Whereas temperature sensitivity dominates for seismic velocities, especially at shallow depths (7,14,15), density also strongly varies with composition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation