2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring the temperature dependence of Beremin cleavage model parameters from the Master Curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the temperature invariance of m over this region may be due to the micro crack distribution and the crack arrest occurrence. This is also observed in [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, the temperature invariance of m over this region may be due to the micro crack distribution and the crack arrest occurrence. This is also observed in [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Using the Master Curve, randomly generate thousands of imaginary test results at the same temperature. Cao et al (2011) recommend 10,000. 3.…”
Section: Methods Of Cao Et Al (2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walters and Dragt (2017) concluded that the number of specimens required to find the correct Beremin parameters was far too large and abandoned this approach. However, by randomly generating data based on the known statistical distribution of the Master Curve, Cao et al (2011) and Qian et al (2015) appear to have been able to "generate" ten thousand samples based on only performing a limited number of tests. While the method of Cao et al (2011) specifies that FE analysis should be run, the procedure itself makes use of SSY specimens, so it should be possible to use analytical methods like those of Andrieu (2012) to avoid the need of FE modelling.…”
Section: Methods Of Cao Et Al (2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20) replaces the exponent of plastic strain in the modified Griffith criterion used previously [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. As before, it is intended to account for the reduction in crack driving force due to plastic dissipation in the matrix (i.e.…”
Section: Micro-mechanically Informed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is to keep the shape parameter constant, which leads to temperature dependence of the scale, u σ [7,8]. Another possibility is to keep the scale parameter constant, which leads to temperature dependence of the shape, m [9,10]. As for the low-constraint situation, m needs to be reduced with increasing temperature, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%