2018
DOI: 10.1101/278630
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring the shape of global epistasis

Abstract: Genotype-phenotype relationships are notoriously complicated. Idiosyncratic interactions between specific combinations of mutations occur, and are difficult to predict. Yet it is increasingly clear that many interactions can be understood in terms of global epistasis. That is, mutations may act additively on some underlying, unobserved trait, and this trait is then transformed via a nonlinear function to the observed phenotype as a result of subsequent biophysical and cellular processes. Here we infer the shap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They might result from mechanistic coupling between nucleotide pairs. Alternatively, they could result from nonlinearities in the relationship between PSI and some intermediate non-epistatic phenotype (e.g., U1 snRNP-5’ss binding energy), a phenomenon known as “global epistasis.” More sophisticated quantitative modeling (e.g., along the lines of Otwinowski et al 2018) might help distinguish between these possibilities in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They might result from mechanistic coupling between nucleotide pairs. Alternatively, they could result from nonlinearities in the relationship between PSI and some intermediate non-epistatic phenotype (e.g., U1 snRNP-5’ss binding energy), a phenomenon known as “global epistasis.” More sophisticated quantitative modeling (e.g., along the lines of Otwinowski et al 2018) might help distinguish between these possibilities in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016 ; Steinberg and Ostermeier 2016 ; Wu et al. 2016 ), combined with new methods for using these measurements to parameterize fitness functions ( Sailer and Harms 2017 ; Otwinowski, McCandlish, and Plotkin 2018 ). Perhaps some day such truly realistic models might be useful for phylogenetic inference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it would be interesting to allow for stronger artificial selection to significantly impact the standing variation and the structure of the phenotypic covariance within a population over time. Indeed, allowing a population to rapidly collapse as it approaches a desired target is a common strategy in evolutionary optimization algorithms [46]-a strategy that could accelerate the design of new functions with directed molecular evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%