2002
DOI: 10.1080/106351502753475862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring the Root of a Phylogenetic Tree

Abstract: Phylogenetic trees can be rooted by a number of criteria. Here, we introduce a Bayesian method for inferring the root of a phylogenetic tree by using one of several criteria: the outgroup, molecular clock, and nonreversible model of DNA substitution. We perform simulation analyses to examine the relative ability of these three criteria to correctly identify the root of the tree. The outgroup and molecular clock criteria were best able to identify the root of the tree, whereas the nonreversible model was able t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
177
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the limited genetic divergence within Pentagramma and the relatively large phylogenetic distance to its nearest relative Pryer 2009), a midpoint rooting approach was employed. Midpoint rooting has been shown to perform well at lower taxonomic levels (Hess and De Moraes Russo 2007) and the alternative, outgroup rooting with a distantly related outgroup, can be problematic (Maddison et al 1984;Wheeler 1990;Huelsenbeck et al 2002;Sanderson and Shaffer 2002;Schuettpelz and Hoot 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the limited genetic divergence within Pentagramma and the relatively large phylogenetic distance to its nearest relative Pryer 2009), a midpoint rooting approach was employed. Midpoint rooting has been shown to perform well at lower taxonomic levels (Hess and De Moraes Russo 2007) and the alternative, outgroup rooting with a distantly related outgroup, can be problematic (Maddison et al 1984;Wheeler 1990;Huelsenbeck et al 2002;Sanderson and Shaffer 2002;Schuettpelz and Hoot 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular clocks can help infer the root of a clade when appropriate close outgroups are unavailable [35]. Given the distant relationship of Sphenodon (the closest living relatives of squamates) and the relatively basal placement of dibamids in the squamate phylogeny, we therefore performed a series of dibamids-only analyses using (i) all positions of all genes, (ii) the nuclear data as a whole, and (iii) the data from individual genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the stationary models HKY and GTR, the root of the tree is unidentifiable as both models are time reversible. Under nonstationary models, the root of the tree is identifiable, but we expect the data to contain little information to root the tree in this way (Yang and Roberts 1995;Huelsenbeck et al 2002).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%