2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work builds on the premise that all nodes are homogeneous. It is valuable to study the rumor-containing problem based on the more realistic node heterogeneity assumption [64][65][66]. The rumor suppression under rumor spreading models with diffusion terms is an interesting topic [67,68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work builds on the premise that all nodes are homogeneous. It is valuable to study the rumor-containing problem based on the more realistic node heterogeneity assumption [64][65][66]. The rumor suppression under rumor spreading models with diffusion terms is an interesting topic [67,68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26. That is to say, minorities in the multiplex networks need more initial support to form the clusters at the steady state than minorities in single networks [51]. This might be understood by the fact that on a single network, one belief (the majority or minority) always tends to form clusters to keep the belief step by step.…”
Section: Multi-scale Abp Model On Multiplex Network With Different Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, it represents a social dilemma. To investigate this issue, several novel approaches, besides studies addressing known rules [8], have been proposed to explain the appearance and survival of cooperation above so-called social dilemma, such as diversity [9][10][11][12], social influence [13][14][15], reputation [16][17][18][19], conformity [20],co-evolution [21][22][23][24], punishment [25,26], reward [27,28], rubust [29], spatial structure [30], to name but a few. Accordingly, spatial structure, referred to as network reciprocity, is known to have an impact on the evolution of cooperation [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%