Inferring the proportion of undetected cholera infections from serological and clinical surveillance in an immunologically naive population

Abstract

SummaryMost infections with pandemic Vibrio cholerae are thought to result in subclinical disease and are not captured by surveillance. Previous estimates of the ratio of infections to clinical cases have varied widely (2 to 100). Understanding cholera epidemiology and immunity relies on the ability to translate between numbers of clinical cases and the underlying number of infections in the population. We estimated the infection incidence during the first months of an outbreak in a cholera-naive population using a Bayesian vibriocidal antibody titer decay model combining measurements from a representative serosurvey and clinical surveillance data. 3,880 suspected cases were reported in Grande Saline, Haiti, between 20 October 2010 and 6 April 2011 (clinical attack rate 18.4%). We found that more than 52.6% (95% Credible Interval (CrI) 49.4-55.7) of the population ≥2 years showed serologic evidence of infection, with a lower infection rate among children aged 2-4 years (35.5%; 95%CrI 24.2-51.6) compared with people ≥5 years (53.1%; 95%CrI 49.4-56.4). This estimated infection rate, nearly three times the clinical attack rate, with underdetection mainly seen in those ≥5 years, has likely impacted subsequent outbreak dynamics. Our findings show how seroincidence estimates improve understanding of links between cholera burden, transmission dynamics and immunity.Key ResultsWe combine serological and clinical cholera incidence in an outbreak in a naive population in Grande Saline, Haiti.The rate of infection withVibrio choleraewas several times the clinical attack rate.Half of the population ≥2 years showed serological evidence of infection.For every reported clinical case ≥5 years old, 3.2 (95% CrI 3.0-3.4) people were infected.Children 2-4 years old had a lower infection rate, which was not significantly different from the clinical attack rate.