Inferring the Phylogeny of the Lejeuneaceae (Jungermanniopsida): A First Appraisal of Molecular Data

Ahonen, Inkeri; Muona, Jyrki; Piippo, Sinikka

doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2003)106[0297:itpotl]2.0.co;2

Cited by 32 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Chloroplast markers have often been used to distinguish plants at the familial and intergeneric levels in bryophytes Cox et al 2000;De Luna et al 2000;Goffinet and Cox 2000;La Farge et al 2000;Long et al 2000;Shaw 2000;Stech and Frahm 2001;Ahonen et al 2002;Pedersen and Hedenäs 2002;Vanderpoorten et al 2002;Virtanen 2003). In addition, studies that use these markers to tease apart relationships at the species or population level are becoming more common (Hamilton 1999;Fujii et al 2003;[Volume 30 SYSTEMATIC BOTANY McDaniel and Shaw 2003;Ohi et al 2003).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Interspecific Variation in the Moss <I>Isothecium</I> (Brachytheciaceae)

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Isothecium myosuroides is an abundant and taxonomically problematic moss that occurs in Europe and on the west and east coasts of North America. It has sometimes been split into two taxa, I. myosuroides on the east coast of North America and in Europe, and I. stoloniferum on the west coast of North America. Isothecium stoloniferum has four distinct morphological types known as the ordinary, julaceous, coarse, and pinnate morphs. The degree to which the morphotypes are genetically distinct versus ecologically determined has been debated as has the distinction between I. stoloniferum and I. myosuroides, resulting in conflicting taxonomic treatments. This study uses phylogenetic analyses of the trnL-trnF and trnG regions of the chloroplast genome to examine relationships among the two species and four morphotypes. Molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal that there is some genetic basis to the morphs of I. stoloniferum, and that I. stoloniferum is paraphyletic. Accessions of I. myosuroides form a trans-Atlantic monophyletic group. The remaining samples form two distinct groups that each include samples of two morphotypes within I. stoloniferum. Populations of julaceous and ordinary morphotypes form a monophyletic group. Populations of coarse and pinnate morphotypes form an unresolved polytomy at the base of the clade that includes accessions of I. myosuroides.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Interspecific Variation in the Moss <I>Isothecium</I> (Brachytheciaceae)

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The same criteria were undertaken for dataset 2, including all taxa with sequences available in GenBank for Jubula and Nipponolejeunea S.Hatt. (Ahonen 2006, Ahonen et al 2003, Konstantinova and Vilnet 2011, Pätsch et al 2010, Wilson et al 2004, 2007), using selected taxa of the Lejeuneaceae and species of Frullania as outgroup based on results from dataset 1. GenBank accession numbers for both newly generated sequences and for already published sequences are provided in Appendices 1 and 2 for datasets 1 and 2 respectively.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The resurrection of Neohattoria Kamim. (Jubulaceae, Marchantiophyta): a six decade systematic conflict resolved through a molecular perspective

Larraín¹,

Carter²,

Shaw³

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The systematic placement of Frullania herzogii has been contentious since its description six decades ago. Over the years it has been interpreted as either a member of the genus Frullania or segregated into its own genus, Neohattoria, due to morphological similarities with both Frullania and Jubula. Here we provide molecular evidence that supports the recognition of the genus Neohattoria and its inclusion within the Jubulaceae, together with Jubula and Nipponolejeunea. Jubulaceae are placed sister to Lejeuneaceae rather than to the monogeneric Frullaniaceae.

show abstract

“…However recent molecular analyses (e.g. Ahonen et al, 2003;Davis, 2004;Ahonen, 2006;He-Nygrén et al, 2004, 2006Wilson et al, 2004Wilson et al, , 2007aHeinrichs et al, 2005;Forrest et al, 2006) have all suggested this genus is more closely related to the Jubulaceae. In fact, more than 50 years ago, Mizutani (1961) placed Nipponolejeunea close to Jubula based on morphological characters such as red alar cells in the capsule wall and one or two archegonia per perianth.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…was placed in its own family (Bryopteridaceae) by Stotler & Crandall-Stotler (1974) and Crandall-Stotler & Stotler (2000) because of its unique branching type. However molecular (Ahonen et al, 2003;Davis, 2004;He-Nygrén et al, 2004, 2006Wilson et al, 2004Wilson et al, , 2007aHeinrichs et al, 2005;Forrest et al, 2006) and morphological cladistic studies (Weis, 2001;Gradstein et al, 2003) both resolve Bryopteris as a member of Lejeuneaceae. The distribution of the 9 bp indel provides support for the view that Bryopteris is a member of the Lejeuneaceae, but Nipponolejeunea shares a more recent common ancestor with genera in the Jubulaceae rather than the Lejeuneaceae.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lejeuneaceae (Marchantiophyta) share an indel in chloroplastrps4 gene

Liu¹,

Jia²

2008

Journal of Bryology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inferring the Phylogeny of the Lejeuneaceae (Jungermanniopsida): A First Appraisal of Molecular Data

Cited by 32 publications

References 24 publications

Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Interspecific Variation in the Moss <I>Isothecium</I> (Brachytheciaceae)

Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Interspecific Variation in the Moss <I>Isothecium</I> (Brachytheciaceae)

The resurrection of Neohattoria Kamim. (Jubulaceae, Marchantiophyta): a six decade systematic conflict resolved through a molecular perspective

Lejeuneaceae (Marchantiophyta) share an indel in chloroplastrps4 gene

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About