2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ner.2019.8717025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring subjective preferences on robot trajectories using EEG signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Users [0, 1,4,5,11,16] had the same event sequence: short and long board connections (shown in grey), connector and board connections (green), and shelf and board connections (yellow). Similarly, other groups of users like [12,13,15], and [3,9,10,14,17] also had the same event sequences. The assembly task is fairly complex; the 32 primary actions can be ordered in more than 24!…”
Section: B Analysis Of User Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Users [0, 1,4,5,11,16] had the same event sequence: short and long board connections (shown in grey), connector and board connections (green), and shelf and board connections (yellow). Similarly, other groups of users like [12,13,15], and [3,9,10,14,17] also had the same event sequences. The assembly task is fairly complex; the 32 primary actions can be ordered in more than 24!…”
Section: B Analysis Of User Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Preferences can then be modelled as a feed-forward neural network that maps task metrics to the survey responses of users [14]. Human preferences for robot actions can also be measured from EEG signals [15], or from a short window of human arm motion [16]- [18] or gaze pattern [19]. Past work has also focused on incorporating user preferences in task assignment and scheduling, where the user preferences are included as a constraint [20], [21] or in the objective function [22] of the scheduling problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chavarriaga et al (2007); Iturrate et al (2010b) and Yousefi et al (2018) have shown that ErrPs are elicited when the subject has to engage in tasks that require a high level of concentration (e.g., motor imagery or cognitive task). The presence of an ErrP when the subjects evaluate the actions of a robotic arm based only on individual subjective criteria was addressed by Iwane et al (2019). The possibility to detect ErrP in a virtual reality environment has been evaluated 2018) have additionally proposed automatically replacing characters with the second-best letter.…”
Section: Error-related Potentials In Brain-machine Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller number of publications utilized informative EEG signals from users who were passively observing a moving robot. Examples include the identification of erroneous actions (Salazar-Gomez et al, 2017;Behncke et al, 2018) or user preferences for robot motion (Iwane et al, 2019;Kolkhorst et al, 2019a). While this allows to infer user judgment of robotic actions, it requires the robot to first perform a candidate action (e.g., moving to the object with the highest prior probability).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%