2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001jb000294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring rate and state friction parameters from a rupture model of the 1995 Hyogo‐ken Nanbu (Kobe) Japan earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, in general, are compatible with estimates of G for other large events, not in the Heaton compilation. For example, from seismic inversions, Guatteri et al (2001) estimate 1.5 MJ/m 2 for the 1995 Kobe earthquake, consistent also with Ide (2002); Olsen et al (1997) and Peyrat et al (2001) estimate 5 MJ/m 2 for the 1992 Landers earthquake. The results are also generally consistent with MJ/m 2 range estimates of G for large events from analyses of large earthquake initiation and arrest (Aki, 1979;Li, 1987;Rudnicki and Wu, 1995).…”
Section: Fracture Energy Estimates and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Our results, in general, are compatible with estimates of G for other large events, not in the Heaton compilation. For example, from seismic inversions, Guatteri et al (2001) estimate 1.5 MJ/m 2 for the 1995 Kobe earthquake, consistent also with Ide (2002); Olsen et al (1997) and Peyrat et al (2001) estimate 5 MJ/m 2 for the 1992 Landers earthquake. The results are also generally consistent with MJ/m 2 range estimates of G for large events from analyses of large earthquake initiation and arrest (Aki, 1979;Li, 1987;Rudnicki and Wu, 1995).…”
Section: Fracture Energy Estimates and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Such models can then be used to investigate the seismic rupture process and fault properties, with implications for fault frictional laws, prestress, static stress drop, or dynamic stresses on the ruptured fault (Ide and Takeo, 1997;Bouchon et al, 1998;Guatteri et al, 2001). An outstanding issue is the influence of fault geometry on rupture dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…large slip events are several orders of magnitude different from those estimated in laboratory experiments (see the discussion in Guatteri et al (2001)). The S-wave velocity c s and the rigidity G are assumed to be 3.5 km/s and 34.3 GPa, respectively.…”
Section: Sse Eqmentioning
confidence: 68%