2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0106-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring parsimonious migration histories for metastatic cancers

Abstract: Metastasis is the migration of cancerous cells from a primary tumor to other anatomical sites. While metastasis was long thought to result from monoclonal seeding, or single cellular migrations, recent phylogenetic analyses of metastatic cancers have reported complex patterns of cellular migrations between sites, including polyclonal migrations and reseeding. However, accurate determination of migration patterns from somatic mutation data is complicated by intra-tumor heterogeneity and discordance between clon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
163
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(115 reference statements)
6
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A method that distinguishes both effects will be future work. In addition, there are possibly more complex cell migration patterns than our model, including reseeding or multisource seeding 16,17 , which are beyond the present study but worth investigating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A method that distinguishes both effects will be future work. In addition, there are possibly more complex cell migration patterns than our model, including reseeding or multisource seeding 16,17 , which are beyond the present study but worth investigating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This may show that there is room for improvement on the present simple model, for example, we should incorporate the stochastic metastatic evolution into the present model. Furthermore, there are possibly more complex cell migration patterns, including reseeding or multisource seeding, which are also beyond the present study, but worth investigating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We leave exploring the trade-off between the two criteria as future work. We note that the transmission number criterion was introduced previously by Slatkin and Maddision [19], while a time-invariant version of the cotransmission number has been applied to the analyses migration in metastatic cancers [3,20]. Supplementary Table S2 provides nomenclature for topological features of transmission networks.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given genomic and epidemiological data, the key challenge is to infer the evolutionary history of the pathogen isolates and the transmission history of the hosts. Importantly, while the phylogeny of the pathogen isolates captures the evolutionary history of the outbreak, it does not necessarily match the transmission history of the outbreak [2]-this mutationmigration discordance also arises in metastatic can-cers [3]. In particular, methods that assume that transmission events coincide with branching events in the phylogeny are only applicable in the context of pathogens with low mutation rates, short incubation times and acute infections [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%