2003
DOI: 10.1126/science.1088821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Nonneutral Evolution from Human-Chimp-Mouse Orthologous Gene Trios

Abstract: Even though human and chimpanzee gene sequences are nearly 99% identical, sequence comparisons can nevertheless be highly informative in identifying biologically important changes that have occurred since our ancestral lineages diverged. We analyzed alignments of 7645 chimpanzee gene sequences to their human and mouse orthologs. These three-species sequence alignments allowed us to identify genes undergoing natural selection along the human and chimp lineage by fitting models that include parameters specifying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

25
557
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 622 publications
(592 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
25
557
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the comparative genomics community, much attention has focused on two problems in particular: (1) identifying (especially noncoding) sequences that are unusually conserved across species, and thus are likely to be subject to negative selection (e.g., [3][4][5][6]); and (2) identifying protein-coding genes that show unusually high d N /d S ratios, and thus might be subject to positive selection (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12]). Methods focused on problem (1) generally have made the assumption (explicitly or implicitly) that selectional pressures are the same across all branches of a phylogeny-i.e., that each candidate sequence is under selection in all species or not under selection in any species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the comparative genomics community, much attention has focused on two problems in particular: (1) identifying (especially noncoding) sequences that are unusually conserved across species, and thus are likely to be subject to negative selection (e.g., [3][4][5][6]); and (2) identifying protein-coding genes that show unusually high d N /d S ratios, and thus might be subject to positive selection (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12]). Methods focused on problem (1) generally have made the assumption (explicitly or implicitly) that selectional pressures are the same across all branches of a phylogeny-i.e., that each candidate sequence is under selection in all species or not under selection in any species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COCH has since been shown to be mutated in DFNA9, a dominantly inherited sensorineural deafness and vestibular disorder (Robertson et al, 1998). Examination of UniGene dbEST and NCBI Blast searches suggests that OTOR is an inner ear-specific gene (Beisel et al, 2004) and under human-specific selection (Clark et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of this approach is that for individual genes there may be too few known polymorphisms to estimate dN:dS or Dr:Dc ratios with sufficient accuracy. Therefore, the methods that identify functionally related groups of genes [7,8,23] will have more power to find evidence of adaptive evolution in patterns of divergence and polymorphism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%