2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Human Demographic Histories of Non-African Populations from Patterns of Allele Sharing

Abstract: Recent human-genetics studies have come to different conclusions regarding how and when modern humans spread out of Africa and into the rest of the world. I present here a simple parsimony-based analysis that suggests that East Asians and Melanesians are sister groups, and I discuss what implications this has for recent claims made about the demographic histories of non-African populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We accessed publicly available high-coverage, whole-genome FASTQ files from previous studies of human genetic variation [52][53][54][55] and combined these with 1,267 high-coverage genomes generated as part of this project. Full details on the samples chosen for sequencing and the informed consent processes for these samples can be found in Supplementary Information 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We accessed publicly available high-coverage, whole-genome FASTQ files from previous studies of human genetic variation [52][53][54][55] and combined these with 1,267 high-coverage genomes generated as part of this project. Full details on the samples chosen for sequencing and the informed consent processes for these samples can be found in Supplementary Information 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is commonly accepted that Southeast Asia was initially populated by the Austro‐Melanesians (Barker et al., ; DĂ©troit et al., ; Matsumura & Pookajorn, ). Subsequent Neolithic dispersals from mainland Southeast Asia or Taiwan left traces of genetic admixture in the extant populations in Southeast Asia (The HUGO Pan‐Asian SNP Consortium, ; Delfin et al., ; Rasmussen et al., ; Lipson et al., ; Matsumura & Oxenham, ; Brandāo et al., ; Soares et al., ; Corny et al., ; Wall, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used our method to investigate the pattern of population splits between Australians, East Asians, Europeans, and Papuans. There has been some debate about the relative ordering of population splits; specifically, there has been competing evidence about whether East Asians and Europeans split most recently (e.g., [26]) or whether Australo-Papuans and East Asians split most recently (e.g., [27]). To date these splits, we used Australian, French, Han, and Papuan individuals from the SGDP [20] and fit models for each of the six possible pairs of these populations, allowing for recent population size changes and pulse admixture.…”
Section: Application To Simons Genome Diversity Project (Sgdp) Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied our method to data from the Simons Genome Diversity Project (SGDP) [20] to investigate the population history of Australians, East Asians, Europeans, and Papuans. There has been some debate whether the population ancestral to Australians and Papuans (which we call Australo-Papuans following [26]) split off prior to the divergence of East Asians and Europeans (e.g., [26]), or whether East Asians and Australo-Papuans first split from Europeans (e.g., [27]). We find substantial evidence in favor of the former hypothesis, but that there has been pervasive gene flow between all of these populations since their divergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%