2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks Using Conditional Regulation Pattern to Guide Candidate Genes

Abstract: Combining path consistency (PC) algorithms with conditional mutual information (CMI) are widely used in reconstruction of gene regulatory networks. CMI has many advantages over Pearson correlation coefficient in measuring non-linear dependence to infer gene regulatory networks. It can also discriminate the direct regulations from indirect ones. However, it is still a challenge to select the conditional genes in an optimal way, which affects the performance and computation complexity of the PC algorithm. In thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a null model with closed-form solution is possible according to previous work [ 44 ] in which the author hypothesized connectivity matrix for inter dataset regulatory networks. Beyond current ARACNE framework, there are many other ways to achieve further parallelism, such as data level parallelism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a null model with closed-form solution is possible according to previous work [ 44 ] in which the author hypothesized connectivity matrix for inter dataset regulatory networks. Beyond current ARACNE framework, there are many other ways to achieve further parallelism, such as data level parallelism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…network dynamics inference). In fact, most previous methods based on Bayesian networks ( de Matos Simoes and Emmert-Streib, 2012 ; Liu et al , 2016 ), graphical Gaussian models ( Krämer et al , 2009 ; Menéndez et al , 2010 ), information theory approaches ( Margolin et al , 2006 ; Xiao et al , 2016 ), correlation approaches ( Yu et al , 2017 ; Zuo et al , 2014 ) and supervised learning approaches ( Huynh-Thu et al , 2010 ; Kotera et al , 2012 ) have focused on only the network structure inference. On the other hand, a few methods using Boolean models ( Kauffman, 1969 ; 1993 ), or differential equation-based models ( Coddington and Levinson, 1955 ) have been proposed to predict both the network structure and dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian networks have been used to model gene expression data 8 – 15 and gene regulatory networks 16 20 . A BN consists of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) 21 , 22 and a set of corresponding conditional probability density functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%