2011
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring disease and gene set associations with rank coherence in networks

Abstract: kuang@cs.umn.edu.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Algorithm 1 shows, these processes are repeatedly applied to each network in every path from the query network to the target network. Values propagated from the query network eventually reach the target network and are then compared with values propagated from the target nodes by correlation [16]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Algorithm 1 shows, these processes are repeatedly applied to each network in every path from the query network to the target network. Values propagated from the query network eventually reach the target network and are then compared with values propagated from the target nodes by correlation [16]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report the AUC values for up to 50, 100, 300, 500, 700 and 1000 false positives. These values are effective to estimate the prediction accuracy of each method for top ranked genes and have been widely used to evaluate gene prioritization methods [13, 22, 31]. For example, the average AUC50 is large if many test genes are ranked highly among the top 50 of the ranking list and the average AUC50 is 1 if all test genes are ranked first in their respective validation runs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarities are calculated based on the medical subject headings description in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database [30]. Following the approach in [7, 11, 31], we construct a k -nearest-neighbor graph of the disease similarity network with k =5, a good choice that has been evaluated by earlier studies [7, 11, 31]. By doing so, there are 21006 edges in the disease similarity network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We focus our study on two recent methods: rcNet (Hwang et al, 2011) and domainRBF ) since they outperform previous methods. Despite their good performance, these methods have clear limitations.…”
Section: Motivation and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%