Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2661806.2661813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Depression and Affect from Application Dependent Meta Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also compared with all the stateof-the-art methods in the AVEC2014 affect recognition subchallenge with fairly good performance. NLPR [4], SAIL [9], BU-CMPE [11] and our method achieve better performance than baseline method, while Ulm [10] achieves best performance. However, it utilized extra information on subjects and annotation process that is not comparable with other methods.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was also compared with all the stateof-the-art methods in the AVEC2014 affect recognition subchallenge with fairly good performance. NLPR [4], SAIL [9], BU-CMPE [11] and our method achieve better performance than baseline method, while Ulm [10] achieves best performance. However, it utilized extra information on subjects and annotation process that is not comparable with other methods.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The single modality regressors are then combined using particle filtering, by treating these independent regression outputs as measurements of the affective states in a Bayesian filtering framework, where previous observations provide prediction about the current state by means of learned affect dynamics. At AVEC2014 affect recognition sub-challenge, the temporal relations in naturalistic expressions was used to boost the performance in decision level filtering [10] [9]. Kachele et al [10] proposed an approach based on abstract meta information about individual subjects and also prototypical task and label dependent templates to infer the respective emotional states and achieved the best performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One could argue that this is not necessary as the different subjects are arriving in a, in a sense, "neutral" affective state at the experiment which is subsequently altered in the course of the recording. There is, however, little evidence for this assumption and also the costs that come with this approach are notable: it tends to result in very characteristic label traces that exhibit a transient phase (Glodek et al, 2012;Kächele et al, 2014). An example for such traces can be seen in Figure 5 where the continuous average labels of the AVEC 2012 and 2014 data sets are denoted together with the frame-wise variances over all sequences.…”
Section: Time-dependent Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variances are present in all channels but most prominently in physiological data and they diminish the classification performance especially when conducting leave-one-subject-out experiments . Performing subject-dependent classification experiments, on the other hand, however, yields comparably high accuracies, often fueled by multiple of the shortcomings in the recording (Walter et al, 2013a;Williamson et al, 2013;Kächele et al, 2014). For example, for subject-dependent classification using physiological signals in an experimental setting with blocked stimuli, classification can work exceptionally well because artifacts from the different blocks might dominate the outcome.…”
Section: Subject Dependencies and Evaluation Of Classification Experimentioning
confidence: 99%