2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-022-09568-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Brain State Dynamics Underlying Naturalistic Stimuli Evoked Emotion Changes With dHA-HMM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 13, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.13.598625 doi: bioRxiv preprint annotations (Meer et al, 2020), and subjective experience including engagement (Meer et al, 2020), attention fluctuations (Song et al, 2023), emotional changes (Tan, Liu, & Zhang, 2022) and narrative integration (Song et al, 2021). Those findings demonstrate the functional relevance of brain state dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted June 13, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.13.598625 doi: bioRxiv preprint annotations (Meer et al, 2020), and subjective experience including engagement (Meer et al, 2020), attention fluctuations (Song et al, 2023), emotional changes (Tan, Liu, & Zhang, 2022) and narrative integration (Song et al, 2021). Those findings demonstrate the functional relevance of brain state dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this study, we used the individual approach to make sure the neural event structures were authentic representations of each fMRI participant's true event segmentations. Hyperalignment may help reduce individual differences across brains (Haxby et al, 2014;Guntupalli et al, 2016;Tan et al, 2022), enabling us to return to the group analysis of neural activities and better investigate the generalizability of the neural event segmentation of auditory stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other branches of neuroscience analyze AFFECT in various related sciences and fields, such as affective neuroscience [199,200], neuroinformatics [201,202], neuroimaging [203,204], systems neuroscience [205,206], computational neuroscience [207,208], neurophysiology [51,209], behavioral neuroscience [210,211], neural engineering [212,213], neuroeconomics [214,215], neurolinguistics [216,217], neuropsychology [218,219,220], neurophilosophy [221,222,223], neuroaesthetics [224,225,226], neurotheology [227,228,229], neuropolitics [230,231,232], neurolaw [233,234,235], social neuroscience [236,237], cultural neuroscience [238,239], neuroliterature [240,241,…”
Section: Brain Affect Devices and Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%