2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring animal social networks with imperfect detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensions of recent work using hidden state modelling may be more appropriate for disentangling true association patterns when detections are potentially biased or imperfect (Gimenez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Carrying Out Regression In Social Network By Separating Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensions of recent work using hidden state modelling may be more appropriate for disentangling true association patterns when detections are potentially biased or imperfect (Gimenez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Carrying Out Regression In Social Network By Separating Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of co‐captures and movements in CMR datasets will depend on capture effort. Spatial or temporal variation in capture effort could therefore lead to spurious differences in network structure being detected if not adequately controlled (Gimenez et al., 2019). Care should be taken when using the network approaches described here when this is likely to be the case.…”
Section: Key Considerations When Using Cmrnetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the location, time and date of each capture are recorded), then under the assumption that co‐located individuals tend to be social associates, co‐captures could be used as a proxy for social associations (e.g. Gimenez et al., 2019; Perkins et al., 2009). Information on co‐location also permits inference of a spatial network of the movement of individuals within a population (Jacoby & Freeman, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that being accurate, “individuals should be missing at random”, an assumption we feel confident with because we have no reason to suspect that those individuals that we fail to observe each year in the field are not a random sample of all the individuals. Coping with missing data is highly relevant when analysing sociality on wild populations, as detection rate for individuals is almost always imperfect, and properly controlling for missed observations is a very important step in social network analysis 76 , 77 . To create and visualize our networks we used the packages Amen 73 , Asnipe 78 , gdata 79 and igraph in R 80 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%