2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000150029.86869.de
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal after 317-day Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The longest period from implantation to retrieval reported to date is 317 days. 34 In the present study, there was no recurrence of symptomatic DVT in the patients with permanent implantation of a GTF. The PREPIC study found that symptomatic DVT occurred in 36% of patients with a permanent filter at 8-year follow-up, 33 but in that study, only 35% of patients were on anticoagulation therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The longest period from implantation to retrieval reported to date is 317 days. 34 In the present study, there was no recurrence of symptomatic DVT in the patients with permanent implantation of a GTF. The PREPIC study found that symptomatic DVT occurred in 36% of patients with a permanent filter at 8-year follow-up, 33 but in that study, only 35% of patients were on anticoagulation therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…6) According to initial clinical reports of retrieval of GTFs, 3) the maximal period of implantation before successful retrieval was recommended to be no longer than 10-14 days. This period was based on results of animal investigation that showed filter legs were incorporated into the contacted IVC wall due to the reaction of IVC Takuji Some recently published clinical studies, 6,9,10) however, reported successful retrieval of GTF after a longer period of implantation. Millward et al 6) noted that the maximal period of implantation before successful retrieval was 25 days, Terhaar et al 9) reported a period of 126 days, and more recently Binkert et al 10) reported a period of 317 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This period was based on results of animal investigation that showed filter legs were incorporated into the contacted IVC wall due to the reaction of IVC Takuji Some recently published clinical studies, 6,9,10) however, reported successful retrieval of GTF after a longer period of implantation. Millward et al 6) noted that the maximal period of implantation before successful retrieval was 25 days, Terhaar et al 9) reported a period of 126 days, and more recently Binkert et al 10) reported a period of 317 days. However, although retrieval has been successful beyond 10-14 days, the incidence of filter fixation to the caval wall increases after 16 days by animal investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Günther Tulip filters have been similarly retrieved at prolonged intervals, e.g. 317 and 475 days [62,63] but with a decreasing success rate as dwell times increase [64]. Recently, Lynch reported removal of a filter at 3006 days after implant [65].…”
Section: Ivc Filters and Dwell Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%