The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.12968/denu.2019.46.3.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior dental blocks versus infiltration dentistry: is it time for change?

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume of anaesthetic required for infiltration is typically around 0.6 mL [36]. The device presented here has a maximum volume of 0.3 mL so would require two injections to achieve an infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of anaesthetic required for infiltration is typically around 0.6 mL [36]. The device presented here has a maximum volume of 0.3 mL so would require two injections to achieve an infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The least allergenic amide LA agents are mepivacaine and plain prilocaine. 32 Allergic reactions are more common with ester LA agents because they are metabolised to para-aminobenzoic acid, a known allergenic compound. 33 Benzocaine is the only ester LA used in dentistry (topical preparations applied before administration of LA).…”
Section: Local Anaestheticmentioning
confidence: 99%