2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10888-014-9280-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference tests for tax progressivity and income redistribution: the Suits approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used ITEP data to calculate a Suits index for each state following methods used in prior studies . The Suits index is a commonly used measure of tax progressivity . Its values range from −1 (a maximally regressive tax) to 1 (a maximally progressive tax), with a Suits index of 0 representing a proportionate tax (neither regressive nor progressive)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used ITEP data to calculate a Suits index for each state following methods used in prior studies . The Suits index is a commonly used measure of tax progressivity . Its values range from −1 (a maximally regressive tax) to 1 (a maximally progressive tax), with a Suits index of 0 representing a proportionate tax (neither regressive nor progressive)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38 The Suits index is a commonly used measure of tax progressivity. [39][40][41] Its values range from −1 (a maximally regressive tax) to 1 (a maximally progressive tax), with a Suits index of 0 representing a proportionate tax (neither regressive nor progressive). 39 Our selection process for state-level covariates is described in the eMethods in Supplement 1.…”
Section: Study Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let X be a pre-tax income variable and Y be a general variable that in some cases will represent tax or benefit T and in others, the post-tax income, defined as Y = X − T. We suppose that X and Y are non-negative random variables. The Suits index, which is interpreted as an average measure of tax progressivity, is based on the relative concentration curve (RCC) of the Y-variable, which plots its cumulative percentage against the cumulative percentage of pre-tax income X when both variables have been ordered in ascending order of X [34].…”
Section: Measuring Progressivity Of the Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La estimación de la etapa (2) es una regresión simple entre los residuos y su primer retardo, obtenidos de la etapa (1), lo que permute estimar el parámetro Ø del esquema AR(1) que sigue una perturbación . Por su parte, el método Prais-Winsten se considera una variante del método Cochrane-Orcutt, que conlleva un tratamiento específico de la primera observación de la serie en lugar de eliminarla.La ecuación de la etapa (1) se ampliaría con la nueva observación y el proceso de estimación igual al descrito por Cochrane-Orcutt (Arcarons & Calonge, 2007). correspondientes a la prueba del Multiplicador de Lagrange (LM, por sus siglas en inglés), lo que permitirá rechazar, o no, la hipótesis nula de linealidad Granger, Teräsvirta & Anderson, 1993;Greene, 2012 En ambas ecuaciones, T es el tamaño de la muestra, p es igual al número de rezagos contenidos en el modelo lineal inicial AR(p), SSR0 corresponde a la Suma Cuadrática de los Residuos del modelo AR(p) estimado, en tanto SSR1, corresponde a la Suma Cuadrática de los Residuos de la ecuación auxiliar.…”
Section: Dondeunclassified