2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2726330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of Trustworthiness from Intuitive Moral Judgments

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
155
2
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
155
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis builds on evidence that people who calculate when presented with the opportunity to behave morally are perceived as less prosocial (27,36), even when they do ultimately wind up making the "right" decision (37,38). Calculating behavior is seen as a sign of doubt or uncertainty (37,39,40), whereas prosocial decisions that are quick, impulsive, or emotional are seen as reflecting genuine moral goodness (38,41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hypothesis builds on evidence that people who calculate when presented with the opportunity to behave morally are perceived as less prosocial (27,36), even when they do ultimately wind up making the "right" decision (37,38). Calculating behavior is seen as a sign of doubt or uncertainty (37,39,40), whereas prosocial decisions that are quick, impulsive, or emotional are seen as reflecting genuine moral goodness (38,41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intimate relationships often foster strong prosocial emotions, such as devotion and love, that encourage extreme cooperative behavior that is insensitive to costs or contexts (25). People impulsively decide to help strangers in emergencies (26), and there are rich traditions of adhering to ethical principles (27) or religious teachings (28)(29)(30)(31) that prescribe rigid guidelines for when cooperation is obligatory, regardless of the costs and benefits to the actor. These diverse examples likely evoke a broad range of proximate psychologies, ranging from intuitive and emotional processes to explicit conscious decisions not to calculate (that may themselves be the result of calculation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un sujeto expresó que eligió pasar un día en vez de acostarse y tener una relación sexual porque pensaba o imaginada que era lo aceptable en la sociedad. Everett (2016) hace una investigación que concluye que las personas que hacen juicios deontológicos son preferidas como agentes sociales, porque son percibidos como más morales y de confianza.…”
Section: Hallazgos Y Discusiónunclassified
“…"), one may take a wider context into account and consider also what consequences the action will bring about for oneself. It was, for example, showed that utilitarians are perceived as cold, calculating, and untrustworthy (Everett, Pizarro, & Crockett, 2016;Uhlmann, Zhu, & Tannenbaum, 2013). Because people may want to avoid being perceived as possessing such negative characteristics, they refrain from expressing support for the utilitarian action (Rom & Conway, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%