2021
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1929515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of the distortion component of hearing impairment from speech recognition by predicting the effect of the attenuation component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical data and modelling work show that the SRT (measured with the German Matrix Test) increases with increasing average hearing loss (approximately < 1 dB SRT loss per 10 dB hearing loss- independent of age [ 21 , 22 ]. By eliminating the factor of hearing loss in an ageing society (by eliminating hearing loss > 20 dB) a single age-dependent factor can be demonstrated (also see Appendix 1 for full statistical analysis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical data and modelling work show that the SRT (measured with the German Matrix Test) increases with increasing average hearing loss (approximately < 1 dB SRT loss per 10 dB hearing loss- independent of age [ 21 , 22 ]. By eliminating the factor of hearing loss in an ageing society (by eliminating hearing loss > 20 dB) a single age-dependent factor can be demonstrated (also see Appendix 1 for full statistical analysis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Kidd et al (2019 ) hence argued that the performance of the relatively poor subjects “appears to be a reflection of a more general problem affecting multiple abilities rather than being strongly related to reduced resolution of any specific cue per se.” This is in line with the notion that no specific and distinct binaural impairment factor can be singled out—as discussed in the introduction—but instead a general suprathreshold processing deficit causes variations across hearing-impaired subjects, such as the “D-component” (for “distortion”) proposed by Plomp (1978 ). Such a “D-component” was employed in recent modelling approaches by Kollmeier et al (2016 ) and Hülsmeier et al (2021 ) as an individual jitter of the internal stimulus representation, which could be interpreted as an individual factor to describe the capacity to process the available information (beyond what is lost by limited or only partly restored audibility). Again, it should be emphasized that the present sample size is too small to draw conclusions about the general HI population, especially since many individual traits and basic psychoacoustic performance metrics were not measured.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the hearing loss, the hearing threshold corresponding to the hearing loss was determined by adding the hearing loss level in dB HL to the hearing loss threshold defined in the ISO 226 (2003) standard loudness curves in dB SPL. The hearing loss values were calibrated to ear drum values as done in Hülsmeier et al. (2021) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with a physiologically plausible CI front-end feature extraction ( Fredelake and Hohmann, 2012 ), FADE was able to predict the unilateral SRTs of CI users ( Jürgens et al., 2018 ) and SRTs of monaural combinations of electric and acoustic listening that occur when CI users have retained acoustic hearing in the implanted ear ( Zamaninezhad et al., 2017 ). FADE also successfully predicts the effects of noise reduction algorithms on SRTs of moderately hearing-impaired listeners on group averages ( Schädler et al., 2018 ) and more recently also for individual hearing-impaired listeners ( Hülsmeier, Buhl, Wardenga, Warzybok, Schädler, Kollmeier, 2021 , Schädler, Hülsmeier, Warzybok, Kollmeier, 2020 ). However, being a monaural model, FADE has not yet been applied to model bimodal speech intelligibility, i.e., a combination of electric and acoustic listening across ears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%