2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-03967-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of node attributes from social network assortativity

Abstract: Social networks are known to be assortative with respect to many attributes, such as age, weight, wealth, level of education, ethnicity and gender: similar people according to these attributes tend to be more connected. This can be explained by influences and homophilies. Independently of its origin, this assortativity gives us information about each node given its neighbors. Assortativity can thus be used to improve individual predictions in a broad range of situations, when data are missing or inaccurate. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Influence on knowledge evolution breadth : duplicate questions negatively correlate with average shortest path length and assortativity coefficient (Mulders et al 2020), suggesting an expansion of the network diameter and increased connection of dissimilar degree nodes. This indicates that high‐degree nodes, such as popular questions, are more inclined to connect with low‐degree nodes, thus potentially expanding the knowledge spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influence on knowledge evolution breadth : duplicate questions negatively correlate with average shortest path length and assortativity coefficient (Mulders et al 2020), suggesting an expansion of the network diameter and increased connection of dissimilar degree nodes. This indicates that high‐degree nodes, such as popular questions, are more inclined to connect with low‐degree nodes, thus potentially expanding the knowledge spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labeled assortativity [18], [19] is the tendency in networks that nodes with the same label ("metabolic") will have greater interconnectivity. We applied our approach to the metabolic coordination of 19 tissues validated on two human cohorts derived from the GTEx dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) includes the following steps: (1) Co-expression module generation using the Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA) [15] algorithm, (2) Module annotation into eight categories (e.g., Metabolism) using enrichment analysis and plurality votes, (3) Community analysis using the CPM (K-Clique Percolation Method) algorithm2 [16] .We used the Monte-Carlo randomization tests [17] to evaluate the significance level of the degree of co-expression of eigengenes of functionally similar co-expression modules (e.g., metabolic), community size and connectivity across the whole human body. Our community analysis tests the metabolic positive labeled assortativity characteristic [18], [19] of our whole-body network, i.e., that tests if similar modules (metabolic modules) exhibit more robust positive connectivity and larger communities than randomly selected actual modules. Labeled assortativity [18], [19] is the tendency in networks that nodes with the same label (“metabolic”) will have greater interconnectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data mining of the users' information can be useful for identifying interaction patterns among the users [2], information credibility assessment [3], and other research purposes. However, it can also create a serious privacy breach to the OSN users by leaking a sensitive attribute or private information about the users [4]. Such data mining technology has reached the public eye through media reports (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%