2022
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msac237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of Gene Flow between Species under Misspecified Models

Abstract: Genomic sequence data provide a rich source of information about the history of species divergence and interspecific hybridization or introgression. Despite recent advances in genomics and statistical methods, it remains challenging to infer gene flow, and as a result, one may have to estimate introgression rates and times under misspecified models. Here we use mathematical analysis and computer simulation to examine estimation bias and issues of interpretation when the model of gene flow is misspecified in an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(176 reference statements)
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The population inherits from each parent a proportion of genes, and inheritance proportions are assumed to be known. This punctual event is a simplified model for processes such as hybridization, horizontal gene transfer or gene flow, that can happen over a period of time [Huang et al, 2022].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population inherits from each parent a proportion of genes, and inheritance proportions are assumed to be known. This punctual event is a simplified model for processes such as hybridization, horizontal gene transfer or gene flow, that can happen over a period of time [Huang et al, 2022].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreting and comparing these complex models is challenging because evolutionary processes are likely heterogeneous along the genome, and it is often unknown a priori if a model is misspecified (Huang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, analyzing local ancestry often begins with imposing a particular model of admixture, then estimating parameters such as admixture times, selection coefficients, or effective population sizes (Gravel, 2012; Liang et al, 2022; Svedberg et al, 2021), which could be highly complex with many degrees of freedom. Interpreting and comparing these complex models is challenging because evolutionary processes are likely heterogeneous along the genome, and it is often unknown a priori if a model is misspecified (Huang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances make it possible to model genomic evolution under the multispecies coalescent (MSC) framework and use full-likelihood methods to estimate the species tree and quantify introgression (Wen and Nakhleh 2018;Zhang et al 2018;Flouri et al 2020). Analyses of both simulated and real data demonstrate that this full-likelihood MSC approach is efficient, accurate, and robust to moderate levels of model violation (Huang et al 2022;Thawornwattana et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances make it possible to model genomic evolution under the multispecies coalescent (MSC) framework and use full-likelihood methods to estimate the species tree and quantify introgression (Wen and Nakhleh 2018; Zhang et al 2018; Flouri et al 2020). Analyses of both simulated and real data demonstrate that this full-likelihood MSC approach is efficient, accurate, and robust to moderate levels of model violation (Huang et al 2022; Thawornwattana et al 2023). A major advantage over approximate methods is the ability to estimate parameters of the species tree and introgression events among branches precisely, including the strength and direction of introgression as well as species divergence times, introgression times and effective population sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%