2022
DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2021.0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
256
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
256
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficient introduction of nonsense mutations within edited cells was confirmed by Sanger sequencing and waveform decomposition analysis ( Supplementary Fig. S1A-B ) (Conant et al 2022). We estimate that ∼60% of alleles were successfully edited ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The efficient introduction of nonsense mutations within edited cells was confirmed by Sanger sequencing and waveform decomposition analysis ( Supplementary Fig. S1A-B ) (Conant et al 2022). We estimate that ∼60% of alleles were successfully edited ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To evaluate if risks of off-target effects increased with the routine usage of two or three different gRNA target sequences in iCAP genome editing method, we performed targeted amplicon sequencing of 50 off-target sites which present 4 or 5 the most closely mismatched off-target sequences for each of 11 different gRNA target sequences used for the study. We used ICE (Inference of C RISPR E dits) algorithm tool (Conant, et al, 2022) to analyze the sequencing data for evidence of indel mutagenesis at the sites examined. The assessment reports show indel rates of zero percent at these top off-target sites suggesting no off-target effects detected and R 2 values of 0.95-1.0 indicating “goodness of fit” of the analysis quality (Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR amplicons produced from experimental (edited) and control (unedited or wildtype) genomic DNA samples were Sanger Sequenced by GeneWiz sequencing service. DNA sequences were then compared & analyzed by using the online I nference of C RISPR E dits (ICE) algorithm tool (Conant, et al, 2022) (https://www.synthego.com/products/bioinformatics/crispr-analysis). A report of ICE analysis provides an R 2 value and indel rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same amounts of gRNA were used in all experimental groups. The efficiency of gRNA was checked by analyzing the sequence of the target sequence with the ICE CRISPR Analysis Tool (Conant et al, 2022) after amplification using a specific pair of primers (Table S2).…”
Section: Silica Crystal Injection and Gene Editionmentioning
confidence: 99%