2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference for Weibull distribution based on progressively Type-II hybrid censored data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dataset was analyzed by different authors using various models [ 43 , 44 ]. In [ 19 ], the authors found that the MED model with two components provided a good fit to the given failure data.…”
Section: Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dataset was analyzed by different authors using various models [ 43 , 44 ]. In [ 19 ], the authors found that the MED model with two components provided a good fit to the given failure data.…”
Section: Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical comparison is performed to compare the performance of the proposed methods and two illustrative examples are discussed. One may also refer to Mokhtari et al (2011), Balakrishnan and Kundu (2013), Kayal et al (2017) for some more interesting applications of Type II progressive hybrid censoring in life testing experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that this censoring scheme can guar antee at least pre-fixed number of failures observed, result ing in lower variability in the reliability evaluation. And that is the primary reason why the model has attracted great attention in the field of reliability [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Among these papers, Park et al [15] obtained explicit expression of the Fisher information under the Type-II hybrid censor ing scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditional on (( s ), the PDF of e jh Luj�lgx ( ' ) + 1 h Z mE(C,) 6, EQi 1 =0 ' 1 d P ( (( d ) I D = d) L L L uj �igX(d)(18) mE(( d) 0, EQi 1 =0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%