2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.21.214387
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat

Abstract: Understanding global communications among cells requires accurate representation of cell-cell signaling links and effective systems-level analyses of those links. We constructed a database of interactions among ligands, receptors and their cofactors that accurately represents known heteromeric molecular complexes. Based on mass action models, we then developed CellChat, a tool that is able to quantitively infer and analyze intercellular communication networks from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. C… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
408
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
408
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies further reinforce the notion that excessive inflammation correlates with negative disease outcome (17,18). Beyond cell identification (19), single-cell analysis can also be used to infer cell-cell interactions (20)(21)(22) and these approaches can help inform disease mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These studies further reinforce the notion that excessive inflammation correlates with negative disease outcome (17,18). Beyond cell identification (19), single-cell analysis can also be used to infer cell-cell interactions (20)(21)(22) and these approaches can help inform disease mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We summarized different methods of inferring cell–cell communication signaling networks in Table 1 . Among these methods, SoptSC [ 8 ], SingleCellSignalR [ 9 ], CellPhoneDB [ 10 ], SpaOTsc [ 11 ], CellChat [ 12 ] and iTALK [ 24 ] are mainly designed for inferring intercellular signaling networks, while NicheNet [ 13 ], CytoTalk [ 25 ], CCCExplorer [ 26 ] and our method scMLnet are designed to infer inter- and intra-cellular signaling networks. The differences between these methods in input, output, main goal, prior information and main algorithm are also summarized in Table 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, considering important spatial distance between cells, SpaOTsc [ 11 ] infers cell–cell communications by ‘optimally transporting’ signal senders to target signal receivers via structured optimal transport to recover spatial properties of scRNA-seq data in the aid of the spatial reference. More recently, CellChat [ 12 ] has been developed to quantitively infer and analyze intercellular communication networks from scRNA-seq data by means of network analysis, pattern recognition and manifold learning approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More comprehensive lists might generate a better correlation or contain more important LR pairs for the GA selection than the ones selected here (Supplementary Table 3). Furthermore, lists of ligand-receptor pairs considering the formation of multimeric complexes can improve the reliability of the results 11,94 , so considering structural information of proteins may also improve the predictions. However, in contrast to mammals such as mice and humans, C. elegans has considerably less information for building comprehensive lists of ligand-receptor interactions containing multimeric complexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%