“…Prophylaxis against IE should primarily be concerned with the maintenance of good oral hygiene and prevention of oral disease to reduce the magnitude and frequency of spontaneous bacteraemia (Longman et al 1993). Because of the increasing evidence that spontaneous bacteraemia is more likely to cause IE than dental procedures (Seymour et al 2000), the importance of soft tissue health as a prophylactic measure for IE cannot be overstated (Lavelle 1996). Ethically, practitioners need to discuss the potential benefits and harms of antibiotic prophylaxis with their patients before a decision is made about antibiotic administration (Oliver et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between dental procedures and IE has been supported by anecdotal clinical reports since 1908 (Robinson et al 1950, Durack 1985 and by animal experimental data (Bahn et al 1978). There is increasing evidence that spontaneous bacteraemia is more likely to cause IE in 'at-risk' patients than specific dental procedures (Seymour et al 2000). Two recent studies concluded that dental treatment was not a risk factor for IE (Lacassin et al 1995, Strom et al 1998.…”
Section: Infective Endocarditis and Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the use of AP in individuals at risk of IE undergoing invasive dental procedures the incidence of the disease has not altered (Durack 1994). Furthermore, this is against a background of a dramatic rise in the numbers of people receiving artificial heart valves (Seymour et al 2000).…”
Section: Infective Endocarditis and Dentistrymentioning
The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence implicating nonsurgical endodontic procedures in inducing infective endocarditis (IE). The literature is reviewed and findings about dental procedures that elicit bacteraemia [in particular root canal treatment (RCT)], sequelae of bacteraemia, relationship between IE and RCT and variation between antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) guidelines are highlighted. At present, there is still significant debate as to which dental procedures require chemoprophylaxis and what antibiotic regimen should be prescribed. Currently, there are insufficient primary data to know whether AP is effective or ineffective against IE. Practitioners are bound by current guidelines and medico-legal considerations. Thus, the profession requires clear, uniform guidelines that are evidence-based.
“…Prophylaxis against IE should primarily be concerned with the maintenance of good oral hygiene and prevention of oral disease to reduce the magnitude and frequency of spontaneous bacteraemia (Longman et al 1993). Because of the increasing evidence that spontaneous bacteraemia is more likely to cause IE than dental procedures (Seymour et al 2000), the importance of soft tissue health as a prophylactic measure for IE cannot be overstated (Lavelle 1996). Ethically, practitioners need to discuss the potential benefits and harms of antibiotic prophylaxis with their patients before a decision is made about antibiotic administration (Oliver et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between dental procedures and IE has been supported by anecdotal clinical reports since 1908 (Robinson et al 1950, Durack 1985 and by animal experimental data (Bahn et al 1978). There is increasing evidence that spontaneous bacteraemia is more likely to cause IE in 'at-risk' patients than specific dental procedures (Seymour et al 2000). Two recent studies concluded that dental treatment was not a risk factor for IE (Lacassin et al 1995, Strom et al 1998.…”
Section: Infective Endocarditis and Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the use of AP in individuals at risk of IE undergoing invasive dental procedures the incidence of the disease has not altered (Durack 1994). Furthermore, this is against a background of a dramatic rise in the numbers of people receiving artificial heart valves (Seymour et al 2000).…”
Section: Infective Endocarditis and Dentistrymentioning
The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence implicating nonsurgical endodontic procedures in inducing infective endocarditis (IE). The literature is reviewed and findings about dental procedures that elicit bacteraemia [in particular root canal treatment (RCT)], sequelae of bacteraemia, relationship between IE and RCT and variation between antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) guidelines are highlighted. At present, there is still significant debate as to which dental procedures require chemoprophylaxis and what antibiotic regimen should be prescribed. Currently, there are insufficient primary data to know whether AP is effective or ineffective against IE. Practitioners are bound by current guidelines and medico-legal considerations. Thus, the profession requires clear, uniform guidelines that are evidence-based.
“…In that report, it was estimated that more than 1 × 10 4 CFU/mL bacteria are present in the bloodstream in approximately 60% of human subjects after invasive dental treatment, which is equivalent to more than 5 × 10 7 CFU in the entire body. In addition, random bacteraemia occurs after tooth brushing and flossing during daily life [28]. This information led us to consider that multiple administration of the bacteria should be evaluated in further studies.…”
Background: We previously reported that intravenous administration of Streptococcus mutans strain TW871 caused typical non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-like findings in a high-fat diet (HFD) mouse model at 16 weeks after initiating the experiment.
Objective: The purpose of the present study was to analyse mice administered S. mutans TW871 fed a HFD for various periods of time.
Methods: First, 6-week-old C57BL/6J mice were fed an HFD for 4 weeks, then TW871 (1 × 107 CFU) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were intravenously administered. Mice were euthanized 12, 16, 20, and 48 weeks after starting the experiment, and conventional clinical and histopathological evaluations were performed.
Results: Typical NASH-like findings were not identified in the mice at 12 weeks, while they were observed in the TW871 group at 16 weeks, and the severity of NASH symptoms were increased at 20 weeks. Furthermore, signs of severe NASH were also observed at 48 weeks. In contrast, in the PBS-administered group, the NASH findings were identified only at 48 weeks and no typical NASH features were observed at 12, 16, or 20 weeks.
Conclusion: These results suggest that intravenous administration of a specific S. mutans strain aggravates NASH in a time-dependent manner in the mice in contrast to mice without S. mutans exposure.
“…Dissemination of oral bacteria into the bloodstream is known to be induced by professional dental treatment and daily oral care practices, such as tooth brushing and flossing, and even food chewing [49]. Also, serotype-specific RGPs were shown to contribute to the resistance to phagocytosis by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes [50].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.