2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492011000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infectious keratitis in patients undergoing Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston KPro) procedure: case series

Abstract: Description of two cases of infectious keratitis in patients after Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston KPro) implantation. The first case refers to a patient that had the device indicated due to limbal deficiency secondary to severe dry eye who presented a fungal infection by Aerobasidium pullulans that was successfully treated with amphotericin B eye drops. The second case reports a patient with Boston KPro implantation due to previous corneal transplant rejection showing bacterial keratitis in the fourth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Reports originating from developing countries were scarce and consisted mostly of case series from Brazil and India. 1314, 20 Causative organisms included both yeasts ( Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida famata ) and molds ( Fusarium spp., Aspergillus spp., Alternaria spp. ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Reports originating from developing countries were scarce and consisted mostly of case series from Brazil and India. 1314, 20 Causative organisms included both yeasts ( Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida famata ) and molds ( Fusarium spp., Aspergillus spp., Alternaria spp. ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymers such as PMMA, poly­(lactic- co -glycolic acid), and polyethylene are commonly used as substrates or scaffolds across many surgical specialties. The inert and hydrophobic properties of these materials, however, induce fibrous tissue envelopment and do not elicit any biological function within adjacent tissue, which is necessary for biointegration. , In KPros, poor biointegration can result in epithelial ingrowth, graft separation or cavitation, corneal melting, aqueous humor leakage, and intraocular infection, leading to implant failure and extrusion requiring further surgery and potentially compromising patient outcomes. Despite these risks, KPro is the only management option where conventional keratoplasty has a high risk of failure, such as in diseases of the cornea with extensive limbal stem cell deficiency and vascularization, as seen following chemical burns. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%