Abstract:Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) that are typified by biofilm formation. Given the diversity of S. aureus strains and their propensity to cause community-or hospital-acquired infections, we investigated whether the immune response and biofilm growth during PJI were conserved among distinct S. aureus clinical isolates. Three S. aureus strains representing USA200 (UAMS-1), USA300 (LAC), and USA400 (MW2) lineages were equally effective at biofilm formation in a mouse … Show more
“…epidermidis infection resolved in many animals, which was similar to previous implant-associated infection models for this organism (Lankinen et al, 2012;Laure et al, 2008;Lovati et al, 2016b). Higher dose inocula may guarantee a persistent infection; however, as reported recently for S. aureus, infectious dose might alter immune responses and has to be considered carefully (Vidlak and Kielian, 2016). Considering our experimental hypothesis that fracture instability predisposes to infection, a low dose inoculum enabled us to differentiate between the development of infection (or not) rather than merely looking for changes in CFU counts, which would be less indicative of an effect.…”
Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a major complication in surgically fixed fractures. Instability of the fracture after fixation is considered a risk factor for infection; however, few experimental data are available confirming this belief. To study whether stable fractures led to higher infection clearance, mouse femoral osteotomies were fixed with either stable or unstable fixation and the surgical site was contaminated with either Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) or Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) clinical isolates. Infection progression was assessed at different time points by quantitative bacteriology, total cell counts in spleen and lymph node and histological analysis. Operated, non-inoculated mice were used as controls. Two inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6 and BALB/c) were included in the study to determine the influence of different host background in the outcome.Stable fixation allowed a higher proportion of C57BL/6 mice to clear S. epidermidis inoculation in comparison to unstable fixation. No difference associated with fixation type was observed for BALB/c mice. Inoculation with S. aureus resulted in a more severe infection for both stable and unstable fractures in both mouse strains; however, significant osteolysis around the screws rendered the stable group functionally unstable.Our results suggested that fracture stability could have an influence on S. epidermidis infection, although host factors also played a role. No differences were observed when using S. aureus, due to a more severe infection, leading to osteolysis and loss of stability in both groups. Further studies are required in order to address the biological features underlying the differences observed.
“…epidermidis infection resolved in many animals, which was similar to previous implant-associated infection models for this organism (Lankinen et al, 2012;Laure et al, 2008;Lovati et al, 2016b). Higher dose inocula may guarantee a persistent infection; however, as reported recently for S. aureus, infectious dose might alter immune responses and has to be considered carefully (Vidlak and Kielian, 2016). Considering our experimental hypothesis that fracture instability predisposes to infection, a low dose inoculum enabled us to differentiate between the development of infection (or not) rather than merely looking for changes in CFU counts, which would be less indicative of an effect.…”
Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a major complication in surgically fixed fractures. Instability of the fracture after fixation is considered a risk factor for infection; however, few experimental data are available confirming this belief. To study whether stable fractures led to higher infection clearance, mouse femoral osteotomies were fixed with either stable or unstable fixation and the surgical site was contaminated with either Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) or Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) clinical isolates. Infection progression was assessed at different time points by quantitative bacteriology, total cell counts in spleen and lymph node and histological analysis. Operated, non-inoculated mice were used as controls. Two inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6 and BALB/c) were included in the study to determine the influence of different host background in the outcome.Stable fixation allowed a higher proportion of C57BL/6 mice to clear S. epidermidis inoculation in comparison to unstable fixation. No difference associated with fixation type was observed for BALB/c mice. Inoculation with S. aureus resulted in a more severe infection for both stable and unstable fractures in both mouse strains; however, significant osteolysis around the screws rendered the stable group functionally unstable.Our results suggested that fracture stability could have an influence on S. epidermidis infection, although host factors also played a role. No differences were observed when using S. aureus, due to a more severe infection, leading to osteolysis and loss of stability in both groups. Further studies are required in order to address the biological features underlying the differences observed.
“…These experiments demonstrate that S. aureus biofilms differentially modify their gene expression patterns depending on the leukocyte subset encountered. The finding that biofilms were more responsive following macrophage addition rather than neutrophils is in agreement with the preferential recruitment of macrophages but minimal neutrophils during biofilm formation [13–16,21,25–27]. While the anti-inflammatory response appears to be driven, in part, by biofilm products, the specific effectors and their mechanism(s) of action have yet to be fully elucidated.…”
Section: Immune Response To Staphylococcal Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This alternatively-activated response induces robust fibrosis surrounding the biofilm, effectively preventing macrophage invasion and phagocytosis of biofilm-associated bacteria, favoring biofilm persistence [15,25,26]. Although proinflammatory cytokine production is detected during S. aureus biofilm infections, this response is clearly not sufficient to mitigate biofilm growth or survival [13–15,27]. This suggests a primary defect in the phagocytes that normally clear bacteria, which is supported by the preferential recruitment of MDSCs into staphylococcal biofilms that possess anti-inflammatory properties by preventing macrophage proinflammatory activity and T cell activation.…”
Section: Immune Response To Staphylococcal Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discrepancies may be explained by the distinct model systems employed; namely the use of a tibial implant pre-coated in vitro with an established biofilm compared to our approach where a sterile orthopedic implant is infected in vivo using a 200-fold lower bacterial dose. Indeed, we recently reported that increasing the infectious inoculum from 10 3 to 10 5 CFU in the mouse PJI model altered leukocyte recruitment and inflammatory mediator production as well as biofilm growth/clearance [27]. This highlights the need to carefully consider infectious doses when examining inflammatory attributes of biofilm infection, in particular to their relevance in terms of modeling events that might occur during native PJI in humans.…”
Section: Immune Response To Staphylococcal Biofilmsmentioning
Staphylococcal species are a leading cause of community- and nosocomial-acquired infections, where the placement of foreign materials increases infection risk. Indwelling medical devices and prosthetic implants are targets for staphylococcal cell adherence and biofilm formation. Biofilm products actively suppress proinflammatory microbicidal responses, as evident by macrophage polarization toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype and the recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. With the rise in prosthetic hip and knee replacement procedures, together with the recalcitrance of biofilm infections to antibiotic therapy, it is imperative to better understand mechanisms of crosstalk between biofilm-associated bacteria and host immune cells. This review describes the current understanding of how staphylococcal biofilms evade immune-mediated clearance to establish persistent infections. The findings described herein may facilitate the identification of novel treatments for these devastating biofilm-mediated infections.
“…Interestingly, the same 10 3 inoculum is reported to be critical to evaluate the immune response to various S. aureus strains in a mouse orthopedic-implant biofilm infection model. This is because all the differences disappeared at a higher CFU (Vidlak and Kielian 2016). Thus, our use of 10 3 CFU could be medically relevant.…”
Infections on implanted medical devices are a challenging problem, especially when bacteria form difficult-to-treat biofilms. Antimicrobial peptides are considered as a solution due to their potency against antibiotic-resistant superbugs. Previously, we demonstrated the prevention of staphylococcal biofilm formation in an animal catheter model by injecting merecidin (formerly known as 17BIPHE2), a peptide engineered based on the only human cathelicidin. This study documents an alternative solution via covalent immobilization of FK-16, amino acid sequence FKRIVQRIKDFLRNLV-amide, which corresponds to the major antimicrobial region (residues 17–32) of LL-37. FK-16 is superior to the longer peptide LL-37 in terms of synthesis cost and the shorter peptide KR-12 in terms of activity spectrum. Indeed, the FK16-coated titanium surface showed a broad-spectrum activity against the ESKAPE pathogens, including Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species. It also demonstrated anti-adhesion and biofilm inhibition capabilities against both S. aureus and E. coli.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.