2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infectious disease dynamics and restrictions on social gathering size

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our results indicate that travel restrictions, especially targeted ones, are often implemented after initial imports have already come into other countries, especially for more transmissible variants, as discussed by others before 25,35 . To limit the extent of local transmission, a combination of measures are necessary to contain spread, including testing at arrival, antigen-testing before large gatherings, isolation while infectious, and vaccination, among others 36 . Lastly, as global air travel and human mobility rebound towards prepandemic levels and beyond, new variants are likely to reach secondary countries much faster, potentially before being identified by genomic surveillance.…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, our results indicate that travel restrictions, especially targeted ones, are often implemented after initial imports have already come into other countries, especially for more transmissible variants, as discussed by others before 25,35 . To limit the extent of local transmission, a combination of measures are necessary to contain spread, including testing at arrival, antigen-testing before large gatherings, isolation while infectious, and vaccination, among others 36 . Lastly, as global air travel and human mobility rebound towards prepandemic levels and beyond, new variants are likely to reach secondary countries much faster, potentially before being identified by genomic surveillance.…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If groups of only size 2 are permitted, then this simplifies to the classic SIR model, and as groups increase in size transmission becomes increasingly nonlinear with powers that sum to the group size. Transmission within groups can also yield multiple infections, i.e., superspreading (Lloyd-Smith et al, 2005) (Boyer et al, 2022).…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review) Preprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These focal susceptibles can be infected when attending any gathering no larger than their risk level, n ≤ k, by any attending infected with risk levels at least as large as the respective gathering size, m ≥ n. In contrast, infections among susceptibles from other subpopulations do not contribute to new focal infections and thus they function similarly to the recovered population. Overall, the transmission term is a weighted average over all gathering sizes according to a distribution, P n , set by society (e.g., by lockdowns) [4]. The risk-SIR model includes transmission heterogeneity as subpopulations with higher risk level attend a larger fraction of gatherings, homophily as subpopulations with higher risk levels preferentially interact at larger gatherings, and super-spreading as multiple infections can occur at large gatherings.…”
Section: Gathering Size Dependent Attendance: Risk-sir Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations