2021
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infectious complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid organ malignancies

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9,23 Noteworthy, in the sensitivity analysis of patients who were treated with ICIs as a second line, those who experienced neutropenia or infections during previous CC were more likely to develop infections during ICIs compared to those who received CC alone, which did not influence the risk of infections during ICIs. Similarly, Ross and colleagues did not observe any association between previous chemotherapy and infection during treatment with ICIs 24 ; however, in this paper only patients affected by severe infections requiring hospitalization were considered, while, in our cohort, the majority of infectious episodes were managed as outpatients. In addition, in this population, the additional risk caused by irAEs and prolonged steroid therapy has been confirmed.…”
Section: Univariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 38%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,23 Noteworthy, in the sensitivity analysis of patients who were treated with ICIs as a second line, those who experienced neutropenia or infections during previous CC were more likely to develop infections during ICIs compared to those who received CC alone, which did not influence the risk of infections during ICIs. Similarly, Ross and colleagues did not observe any association between previous chemotherapy and infection during treatment with ICIs 24 ; however, in this paper only patients affected by severe infections requiring hospitalization were considered, while, in our cohort, the majority of infectious episodes were managed as outpatients. In addition, in this population, the additional risk caused by irAEs and prolonged steroid therapy has been confirmed.…”
Section: Univariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 38%
“…In patients who had at least one infection, irAEs (72% vs 49%, P = .006) and prolonged steroid therapy for their management (73% vs 31%, P < .001) were more frequently observed. The median (q1-q3) time to irAEs since the start of therapy was 9 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) weeks in patients without infections, as compared to 13 (3-31) weeks in subjects with at least one infection (P = .064).…”
Section: General Characteristics Of the Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among patients taking anti-CTL4 agents, 70% develop adverse events, 20% of which are severe [ 35 ]. In addition, 30% of patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 develop an infectious complication [ 36 ]. In patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1, 80% develop adverse events, 8% of which are severe [ 35 ].…”
Section: Monoclonals Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En una revisión publicada por J. A. Ross et al 6 se describe que la tasa de infección es del 18% al 19% en los tratados con inhibidores del Check point, donde el uso de corticoides no se asoció con un mayor riesgo de infección. En el 24% de los pacientes se sospechaba la presencia de infección bacteriana, con un 8% de cultivos bacterianos confirmados.…”
Section: Discusión Clínicaunclassified