2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infectious complications in cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rafailidis et al [42] conducted the first systematic review in 2007 and demonstrated that there was an increased risk of developing monoclonal antibodies related severe infections but not for fatal adverse events. In consistent with previous results, two later meta-analyses also showed that EGFR-monoclonal antibodies significantly increased the risk of developing severe infections but not for fatal adverse events [16, 43]. Recently, Qi et al performed another meta-analysis and showed that there was an increased risk of developing all-grade (RR 1.45, p < 0.001) and high-grade (RR 1.59, p < 0.001) infectious events in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab [44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Rafailidis et al [42] conducted the first systematic review in 2007 and demonstrated that there was an increased risk of developing monoclonal antibodies related severe infections but not for fatal adverse events. In consistent with previous results, two later meta-analyses also showed that EGFR-monoclonal antibodies significantly increased the risk of developing severe infections but not for fatal adverse events [16, 43]. Recently, Qi et al performed another meta-analysis and showed that there was an increased risk of developing all-grade (RR 1.45, p < 0.001) and high-grade (RR 1.59, p < 0.001) infectious events in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab [44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In a meta-analysis, it was shown that both drugs were related to a significantly increased risk of grade 3–4 infections, but only cetuximab was associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia [91]. In this analysis, studies where anti-EGFR mAbs were used for indications other than mCRC, were also included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous meta-analysis conducted by Kaymakcalan et al [65] demonstrated that treatment with mTOR inhibitors was associated with a significant increase in the risk of developing infections. More recently, two meta-analyses also found that the use of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing high-grade infections and febrile neutropenia [66,67]. However, the incidence and risk of infections with bevacizumab remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%