Diseases of Poultry 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781119421481.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infectious Bursal Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 324 publications
4
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first reporting of the disease was in the area of Gumboro, Delaware, USA from broiler flocks in 1957 (Eterradossi and Saif, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first reporting of the disease was in the area of Gumboro, Delaware, USA from broiler flocks in 1957 (Eterradossi and Saif, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease affect young chickens that had lymphoid tissues especially cloacal bursa (bursa of fabricious) in which it caused severe destructive lesions leading to immunodeppression and death (Eterradossi and Saif, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBDV has been successfully adapted to cell lines originated from chicken embryo, including chicken embryo bursal cells, kidney cells, and fibroblast cells [3,15,20,25,27]. IBDV also has been propagated on cell cultures including turkey and duck embryo cells [20], mammalian cell lines derived from rabbit kidneys [24], Vero cells [7,10,17], derived from African green monkey kidneys; BGM-70 cells [10], derived from givet monkey kidneys; and MA-104 cells [10] from fetal rhesus monkey kidneys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virus is normally present within the bursa of Fabricius as well as other organs such as skeletal muscle, intestines, kidney, and spleen. Two serotypes of the virus have been isolated from chickens; serotype I is pathogenic with high antigenicity whereas serotype II is not pathogenic and is not followed by any clinical signs or immunosuppression [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be achieved based on clinical symptoms, flock history, and necropsy approaches. However, accurate detection can only be accomplished by applying diagnostic methods such as in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%