Infection: Nutritional Management in Adults

Tayek, Chandler J; Tayek, John A.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375083-9.00160-4

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Statistically, these differences were highly-significant (P-value <0.001). This finding agrees with Tayek et aland Kumar et al where it was found that fasting sugar is high in diabetic patients compared to control where its level was normal [11,12]. The results in Table 1, Fig.…”

Section: Diabetic Parameters Assessmentsupporting

confidence: 91%

To Investigate the Associations of Dyslipidemia and BMI, as Risk Factors Leading to Insulin Resistance and Development of Type2 Diabetes Mellitus in Baqubah City

Safa Nadhum Mohammed,

Walaa Esmael Jassim,

Najah Ali Mohammed

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insulin resistance is a condition in which persons with type 2 diabetes make insulin but is unable to use it properly to transfer glucose into cells, resulting in high blood glucose levels. Obesity, particularly visceral fat (fat surrounding the organs) is a major cause of insulin resistance. The homeostasis model evaluation is the gold standard method for determining whether or not a person is insulin resistant. This article tries to investigate the development of the values of some parameters among type 2- diabetic patients versus normal levels of healthy control groups these parameters included FBS, HbAIc (%), FIL, HOMAIR age BMI and lipid profile. The results found that the means values of FBS(mg/dl), HbAIc (%), FIL (miu /L), HOMAIR were (175.96± 39.68, 9.74±1.82 , 18.99±5.98 , 8.136±2.53) respectively versus normal levels of control group (85.44±7.58, 4.92±.500 , 5.79 ± 0.5, 1.22±0.17). While means of age and BMI (kg/m²) of cases were (54.27±13.35, 32.20±2.23) versus the mean for the control group (47.12±10.77, 26.04±1.65) respectively. The levels of total cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), LDL (mg/dl) and VLDL (mg/dl) among type-2 diabetic patients were(238.19±8.27, 183.48±7.66, 117.20±8.59, 36.69±4.28) respectively versus normal concentrations among control groups with mean values (146.03±7.48, 137.54±7.43, 87.55±6.92, 23.6±5.58) respectively, While the mean value of HDL-C was (40.34±9.82) in patients and (52.31± 4.94) in control. In all these parameters there were highly significant differences between case and control (with (p-value= >0.001) and the mean values of patients with type 2 DM were more than control except the values of HDL-C were in patients less than in control. This study found that the results of the tests FBS, HbAIc (%), age BMI and lipid profile in patients with diabetes type 2 in comparison to the control group have a significant correlation with FIL, HOMAIR.

show abstract

Section: Diabetic Parameters Assessmentsupporting

confidence: 91%