2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1144-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
106
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…45 Most of these risk factors can be mitigated by appropriate nosocomial hygiene practices, and through the use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. 3,6,9,46,47 However, no strategy has proven effective in completely eliminating the risk of infections related to implant surgery. Strategies to discourage bacterial adhesion to implants have included antibacterial surface coatings and treatments, and the development and use of nanostructured surfaces, or a combination of these methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Most of these risk factors can be mitigated by appropriate nosocomial hygiene practices, and through the use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. 3,6,9,46,47 However, no strategy has proven effective in completely eliminating the risk of infections related to implant surgery. Strategies to discourage bacterial adhesion to implants have included antibacterial surface coatings and treatments, and the development and use of nanostructured surfaces, or a combination of these methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after total joint replacement are a severe complication resulting in high morbidity for the patient as well as extensive costs for the health care system [1,2]. The frequency of PJI is estimated to be 0.4-2 % in primary total arthroplasty [3], rising up to 5-15 % in high risk patients and in revision surgery [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 By 2030, the number of procedures in the United States is projected to increase by 174% to nearly 600,000 procedures per year, while hip revision procedures are expected to double by the year 2026; 3 furthermore, MRSA infections in periprosthetic surgeries have had a historic occurrence of 1-2% in primary surgeries and rises to 3-4% in revision surgeries 1,4 and with the rise in the procedures the use of AICBs are also expected to increase. The combination of calcium beads with antibiotics is an off-label use and guidelines for AICBs are only specified for the use of the calcium beads alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%