2002
DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection control hazards of intraoperative forced air warming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Therefore, SSI may result from the implant being contaminated by a few organisms, 32 or in some orthopedic cases even a single Staphylococcus aureus bacterium may be sufficient. 33 Although the present study did not evaluate the link between FAW and SSI rates, the findings in this study and those of others 2123 suggest that bacteria colonize the internal air path surfaces of the majority of FAW blowers. The findings also suggest that a significant percentage of FAW blowers are emitting particulates, which were shown to originate inside the blowers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 Therefore, SSI may result from the implant being contaminated by a few organisms, 32 or in some orthopedic cases even a single Staphylococcus aureus bacterium may be sufficient. 33 Although the present study did not evaluate the link between FAW and SSI rates, the findings in this study and those of others 2123 suggest that bacteria colonize the internal air path surfaces of the majority of FAW blowers. The findings also suggest that a significant percentage of FAW blowers are emitting particulates, which were shown to originate inside the blowers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…19 Most FAW devices contain a “0.2 µm rated” intake filter 20 to prevent the devices from becoming internally contaminated and to lessen the mobilization of airborne contamination in the operating room. However, several studies have reported colonization 2123 on the internal surfaces of the warm-air blower devices and one study was able to repeatedly culture microbes from the blower's airstream; 21 this study recommended the placement of a distal hose end filter to lessen FAW microbial emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Unlike forced-air warming, there is no consumable associated with use of the heating pad, so the latter is cheaper in long-term use. For forced-air warming, the hose, the warming units and even the brand new commercial blankets have been shown to be potential sources of nosocomial infection [3][4][5]. The heating pad warming system, which comprises a control unit, an electric cable and a heating pad, has no hidden space for bacterial colonisation and is theoretically easier to clean.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although inexpensive, cost remains a concern because the air blanket cannot be reused. Moreover, the hose and the warming unit are potential sites for bacterial colonization, probably due to the difficulty in cleaning these parts [24]. The circulating-water mattress has no hose or hidden spaces, and is easier to clean and disinfect than the forced-air warming system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%