Infección periprotésica en pacientes ancianos tratados mediante hemiartroplastia de cadera tras fractura intracapsular ¿Es el uso de cemento impregnado con altas dosis de antibiótico es un factor asociado a su disminución?.

Abstract

Objective: to study whether the use of cement with a high dose of antibiotics is a factor associated with a lower infection rate in hip hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture.Material and methods: a retrospective cohort study of 144 consecutive patients treated surgically for a cervical hip fracture with cemented hip hemiarthroplasty between February 2015 and February 2017. In 88 (61.1%) high dose antibiotic cement was used, defined as a concentration ≥ 5% of the total weight (Group 1) and in 56 (38.9%) cement without antibiotics was used (Group 2). The primary outcome variable was periprosthetic infection.Results: there were 2 (1.38%) infections that were classified as deep, both in group 1. One of patients had a superficial infection in group 2. We did not find differences in the rate of infections between the two groups. Among the intra-surgical complications, we found two failures of the cement-prosthesis interface (non-adherence of the cement to the stem at the end of the setting time), both cases occurred in group 1. There was no allergic or toxic reaction. The mean survival time of all operated patients was 2.7 years (95% CI: 2.4-2.9) at the end of follow-up. We found no differences in survival when stratified by the use or not of antibiotics in cement, p = 0.874.Conclusion:In our experience, in patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasties the use of cement with a high dose of antibiotic is not associated with lower infection rate when intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is correct.